somejew has not answered the clear proof from maran bet yosef re pikuach nefesh docheh somejews [mistaken] understanding of the 3 shavu’ot.
all he did id quoting a mussar teaching in the name of hafets hayim written by a talmid of his.
in any other halachik discussion he would be laughed at
whenever someone would attempt to be doche a clear halachik proof from bet yosef
with a etsa tova from a talmid of hafets hayim
against the pashtut of maran bet yosef , tur and rambam based on clear gemarot
without any holek
.
why is the halachik question of multiple pikuach nefesh questions any different ?
somejew’s approach is highly irresponsible and deviates in an extreme way from centuries old hallowed halachik practise
practise based on clear halachk proof and reasoning
.
somejew is being brainwashed by SR writings who mixes agada and drush with halacha.
have big suspicion that even SR himself did not consider his own writings as plain halacha
SR was on a holy mission
to convince as many people as possible to sever any connection with the Z porkei ol
anything usable for his holy mission , he would use
agada , drush , pseudo halacha , screaming , tears , [both of those last ones from his pure heart]
and he succeeded in great part to achieve many of his goals in that regard
.
.
this approach which deviates from cold halachik reasoning as practised for many centuries is obvious
same with his copy and paste talmidim like somejew and katan
they cannot responsibly equate their reasoning with any of the tshuvot lehalacha of our gdolei haposkim
we are talking halacha here
clear halacha
clear pikuach nefesh
no one would or
ever did approach halachik pikuach nefesh hachamur questions in such an irresponsible cavalier and flippant way
.
.