Azi said:
>>JayMatt19,
You are correct in quoting me, but you haven’t seen the Aruch inside, so it’s only fair that you don’t understand what he was referring to (and ipso facto what I meant).<<
No, I have seen it inside. Do you often make accusations without basis of fact?
>> He wrote that it is no longer a dover sheberva and therefore a man can make a brocha in front of uncovered hair. He didn’t write, nor did I claim that he wrote that women do not need to cover their hair.<<
He did not write that it is “no longer” he was discussing a situation where one is in a location where such is the practice. He did not say that is is now an “across the board halacha”. It is actually quite a relative halacha.
Additionally, you did not initially make this distinction. You originally claimed “See the Aruch Hashulchan who paskens that hair in longer a dover sheberva, since woman don’t cover it anymore.” This very much implies that since it is not a davar sheb’erva, one need not cover it. You did not make the distinction that this was solely a halacha regarding brachos. It was only after Joseph made the distinction that you applied it as well. Did you not know the distinction? Did you want people to look it up? or did you purposely mislead people?
>>Do you think I assumed that the Aruch Hashulchan was a reform rabbi, changing halacha with the times?<<
Not at all.
>> He wrote what I said he wrote, thats a fact, if you don’t like it, go find where he’s buried and complain.<<
That is like saying Dovid Hamelech said: ??-??-????? ??? ??-?????? ?????
>> I’m just his humble messenger. <<
I’m not sure what disturbs me more the claim of being a messenger, or the claim of doing it humbly. Neither one seems fitting