wolfishmusings: Now that you admit that proponents of the toeiva lobby must support polygamy to be intellectually honest, the same point demands that these demagogues who support toeiva also support adultery. If one abomination (toeiva) is acceptable, then another (adultery) is no less.
No it’s not. That’s utter nonsense.
One could make the argument that in a same-sex marriage, you make a commitment to one partner — whereas adultery is a betrayal of that commitment.
And, in any event, I noticed how you backed away from your original strawman. You didn’t say that if one accepts SSM then you must accept adultery — you said that if you accept SSM, then you must accept beastiality — which is completely untrue.
Again, all I ask is that if you’re going to argue against SSM, then do so on the merits — but don’t use the “slippery slope” fallacy and scaremongering.
The Wolf