Home › Forums › Bais Medrash › Minhagim › Kula Creep – The Creation and Use of Non-Existent "Kula's" › Reply To: Kula Creep – The Creation and Use of Non-Existent "Kula's"
Charlie – “The Rosenbergs were given a penalty prescribed by law. They had a fair trial.”
True, they had the legal right to execute them. But how could anyone call the slaughter of two innocents -“a fair trial”?
“Go find a country where Jews are treated better. You won’t find one.”
I have no idea where Jews are treated better -I haven’t lived in every country, but then again, neither have you!
“If D.M.D. doesn’t apply in the US, it doesn’t apply anywhere.”
Well, perhaps it doesn’t!
“Frankly, I would be happy if the courts would be tougher on business on religious accomodation cases…”
This last paragraph is the clincher. Clinton and Obama aren’t liberal enough for you. So when are you going to stop blaming the Republicans for everything wrong in this country? When the Commies make a revolution and this becomes Mother Russia, who are you going to blame then?
And I was talking in my legal case about they didn’t apply the law as written. For some reason everytime I bring this up you jump on your soap box and scream that the law has to be stronger
and this is the fault of the Republicans. Perhaps. But, my beef is that our Court system didn’t apply the law as written equally to Jews as to other groups that have beed discriminated against.
The law states in employment -that the religious beliefs of an individual has to be accommodated unless there is “undue hardship”. The Courts didn’t uphold my rights as an individual to practice my religion. I never have seen them do this with any other religion. And if the Courts decision was based on the written law that the company had a legal loophole of “undue hardship”; I’m still waiting to be informed what that is. Since the Company, nor the Judge put this in any legal paper, I assume there isn’t any. So why wasn’t the law applied to me, like any other American, if it isn’t because the Court system is bias?