basket of radishes:
“Sorry to all you people who hate the idea of liberalism. A short sentence is not liberal. IT is permissive. This is permissisivsm. This is not liberalism. Get your facts right… Comparing a permissive policy with a liberal policy is like comparing goats to horses… All of you who bash liberalism when its really the pacificism and the permissivism that you hate should be ashamed of yourselves. You are using liberalism as a scapegoat.”
Seeing as the liberals are in the vast, vast majority of cases the advocates of pacificism and permissivism, I hardly think it’s a stretch to refer to pacifist/permissive ideals as liberalism. And I certainly don’t think it’s something to be ashamed of.
“Get your facts right… Comparing a permissive policy with a liberal policy is like comparing goats to horses… This antiliberalism is G-dless and pagan. All of you who bash liberalism when its really the pacificism and the permissivism that you hate should be ashamed of yourselves… Are you nuts?… I know your idea wont resonate with any of the educated and intelligent voters…”
I hate to mix topics, weren’t you just bashing people who “denigrate” others in the “tzitzis in the summer time” thread? How exactly is what you have said here not denigrating others?