Reply To: Lo Taturu and Women

longarekel: However the Rambam brings the halacha of ma’asei eretz mitzrayim in hilchos issurei biah which indicates that it is in the category of ‘znus’ and included in acharei eineichem.

I have found the rambam you mention in issurei biah 21:8 and he states clearly:

??”? ????? ?? ???? ??? ????? ????. ???? ?? ??? ????? ???? ??? ?? ???? ???. ????? ??? ?????? ?????? ???? ???? ??? ????? ??? ?? ???? ??? ???? ??? ????

The rambam clearly categorized this issur as NOT z’nus. Why is it in Hilchos issurei bi’ah? I would say, that although the transgressor isn’t considered a zonah, as you can see in the Magid Mishna 21:8 that we don’t pasken like rav huna that says she would be pasul for kehuna, it’s still relevant as some might think that its considered bi’ah or that it can turn a woman in to a zonah. I understand that the issur here is of going in the ways of the goyim.

I would like to see some of the sources that acharei eneichem applies to any aveiroh. I always thought that it only applied to z’nus aveiros.