GAW: “So was Rosa Parks, and Dr. King.
And?”
Perhaps if you explain what your original point was, then I can understand. I thought (as per the article) that the point was that the woman in question doesn’t really care about Charaidim. My answer to that is “so what”? A wrong is a wrong, no matter who points it out, or the purpose of doing so.
If you are bothered by the “premeditation”, then other campaigns were premeditated as well, such as Dr. King’s march.
(no “ands” 😉