midwest: There has never been anything published in NASI”s name with signatures of R”Y attached. That is to say NASI has purposely not published in any public format the names of the Rabbonim and R”Y who support, endorse and advise their specific course of action. (for the record, -and for cr memeber ISA – people who contact the program are welcome to the information, and especially people who are on a “need to know” basis, to bad the anonymous CR chevra doesn’t make the cut). Please do NOT imply that NASI used the 70 R”Y support any of their inittives. That is simply false and it’s not like there has ever been any kind of action by NASI that could even remotly lead to that mistake.
All that NASI ever said in the names of the 70 R”Y was exactly what they themselves stated in their own handwirting. That letter was for all intents and purposes unrelated to the NASI Project and many of the people who signed the letter (at that time) probably never heard of the NASI Project. It wasn’t and isn’t meant to be a endorsement of any specific course of action that NASI has or will do, and no one ever claimed that it is.
It is a letter stating exactly what it stated.
Your insinusation that NASI used that letter as support for it’s specific programs, and your subsequent challenge that a R”Y who signed did or doesn’t follow a specific program is irrlevant and disingenuos at best.