coffee addict, she said she’s a feminist. She didn’t mention Women’s Lib. The two terms are NOT synonymous. In the words of my history professor: “You believe in equal pay? Good. You’re a feminist.” The movement has been polluted with all the Women’s Lib and girl power baloney to the point that “feminist” is a dirty word. Which was very dumb of them. But nothing that QB wrote identifies with that faction, so I’m assuming that she’s one of the good guys.
I don’t disagree with the overall gist of your post (except the point about housework – and I still have no idea what your first post was on about), but I think you are arguing from a completely different angle that doesn’t actually address the point at hand. (I guess the OP sort of lends itself to that, though.) The point is, does abuse of rights mean that the rights are undeserved? From a democratic perspective, the answer is no.