Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Last week's Ami › Reply To: Last week's Ami
January 21, 2013 5:50 pm at 5:50 pm
#922167
slave-to-g-d
Participant
Bringing in Dan L’kaf Zechus might be irrelevant, because it is only required when the person is not “muchzak”(established) to be a rasha. Some of the things he addmitted to doing might make him “muchzak” as a rasha. However, one could argue that “ein adom meisim atzmoh rasha”(a person is not believed to make himself a rasha) and we therefore must consider him a beinonei(non-rasha and non-tzadik). Anyone know what the halacha is?