So in other words there is no precedent. I’m glad you are ready to admit that. Now apologize to us for trying to fool us with misleading and ridiculous arguments, and then try making a normal one.
It seems like you want to argue that it was not a good thing to make the kosel into a shul, and that it should be reversed so that it no longer is a shul. And then somehow you want to argue that that has a bearing on this discussion. Please, by all means, go ahead and make those cases.