Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Archeology and the Torah › Reply To: Archeology and the Torah
One of the Bible Critics points against the Torah were that Camels were not domesticated at the time the “Patriarchs” allegedlly lived.
Alas, as archeology advanced this was proven wrong, it’s now an established fact that camles were in fact domesticated.
Let’s go further.
Bible Critics claim that the Torah was written hundreds of years after the case.
The problem?
There are lots of them. One of them is that the Torah constantly gives the exact geneology of the protaginists.
This geneological record consists of name after name that is age specific to the period that the “patriarchs” lived according to our Mesorah but were forgotten almost completly during the times that the Bible Critics claim the Torah was written.