Reply To: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe

Thanks for the clarification, appreciated. I hope you noticed in my post that I didn’t classify ALL Litvaks, I said some. And yes I do think it’s absurd to think that people tell us what we believe, based on a one liner from am entire part of Torah they’re not familiar with. We assure them they’re misunderstanding and explain or refer to where they can understand. Yet they’re still self assured that they know better our Chassidus/ Rebbe etc.

Did you deliberately miss my point or did you not understand that I was referring to your extensive but false narrative in that post about what litvaks do, what they are taught and what they know about chassidus and lubavitch? Perhaps this is what you were taught to believe, perhaps it was your own misinterpretation, but the disclaimer was on your narrative.

So since this is a new thread, if there are further questions you would like me to address, please repost.

I think I left off with yankel Berel, I don’t remember the list of questions by heart, but the point was we differ on the first of them which renders the rest inapplicable. If you’d like you’re welcome to repost.

Regarding the flip flop yb loves to post about Gimmel Tammuz and moshiach min hachaim etc. I’d like to point out that Chabad’s opponents equally flip flopped. Before Gimmel Tammuz, they assured us that we must be wrong, because not the Rebbe nor any other Torah leader was great enough to be considered a candidate for Moshiach and he therefore must come from the meisim.

After Gimmel Tammuz they flip flopped and call thinking the Rebbe as Moshiach to be all kinds of extreme things. So I’m interested in hearing from you, as you’re very honest, why the flip flopping from the velt?