- This topic has 5 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 6 months ago by .
-
Posts
-
It’s just an antiperspirant and deoderant 🙂
Thank you!
Who do you think you’re kidding?
I happen to think that the North Korea ban is the most indefensible thing an American president has done since Watergate. People aren’t allowed to leave North Korea. They’re starving and unable to do anything. People try and fail to run away to China all the time. If a North Korean manages to actually make his way over here, sending him back would be akin to a death sentence. How can we stop North Koreans from coming here, even if the odds of them making it are slim to none anyway?
“It’s just an anti-perspirant and deodorant.”
What about “Right Guard”? I’m surprised the liberals haven’t demanded a boycott of this product, for reasons that should be obvious.
Sam, be a deep thinker. If someone gets out of NK they’re not flying directly from Pyongyang to New York. They’re certainly going to another country first. So they’re already out of NK before they get to the US. Keeping them from the US only means they must stay in whichever other country (South Korea, etc.) they’re already in. Not being allowed to travel to the US (which is one of 195 countries in the world) certainly does not mean being forcibly repatriated to NK.
The ban from North Korea is completely symbolic, it has no practical ramifications.
As Joseph explained, if someone can get out of North Korea, they can figure out a way to get into the US.
But the only symbolic meaning here is agreement with Kim.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.