Is Trump tripping, will he go back to WAR?

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Is Trump tripping, will he go back to WAR?

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2571301
    pure yiddishkeit
    Participant

    Is Trump tripping on the whole world, as he seemingly loves to do, and is stalling for time for whatever reason, be it preparing militarily or intelligence, or has he folded to the pressures within to wipe up the Iran mess?
    Has his “Abraham Accords” fallen apart, as some members or “potential” members seem to be either swaying more towards Iran, or re-arranging themselves by creating new blocks to cut out the USA??

    #2571680

    I asked gemini to give a politically unbiased answer to these burning shailos:
    here is the summary of hatt:
    Foreign policy experts generally dismiss the idea that the administration is “tripping” or acting entirely without a plan; rather, it is executing a deliberate—and high-risk—negotiating strategy.

    Have the Abraham Accords Fallen Apart?
    The short answer is no, they have not fallen apart—but they are facing significant structural stress and a shifting regional landscape.

    The administration is not folding, but it is trying to execute an incredibly complex maneuver: leveraging military pressure to force a deal with Iran, while simultaneously trying to upgrade the Abraham Accords from individual bilateral agreements into a sweeping, US-led regional security bloc.

    Whether this succeeds depends on whether Middle Eastern powers decide that a formal alliance with Israel is worth the regional risks, or if they will continue to favor the flexible, independent balancing act they are currently practicing.

    #2572516
    pure yiddishkeit
    Participant

    Seems like my suspicions were right in the end, no I mean it seriously, did Trump really believe what he said in the last few weeks??

    This seems to be a pattern of his, taking the world for a ride, everyone latching onto what he says, and than out of nowhere comes boom! an entirely different action no one was suspecting, and that might actually be his tactic….? keeping the world at edge can actually be a tactical move of his I think….

    #2572770
    @fakenews
    Participant

    Politicians lie.
    Take it to the bank.

    You can only know what they really believe by looking at their actions.

    #2573132
    yechiell
    Participant

    trump is , so far, good for israel and jews.
    nevertheless, the man belongs in an insane asylum, for sure.

    #2573880
    keith
    Participant

    In the first Trump administration his supporters said – correctly – he is not a politician, he is a businessman and a showman. Take what he says seriously but not literally. He says all kinds of crazy stuff but he seems to have an idea what he wants to do. Don’t listen as much as watch. He seems to have a very big ego and seems to have a very big love for America. He sees – as do all people of even average intellect – that Iran is a danger to the world and however much it can strangle the world’s energy supply now – it will be able to do so much more and cause much greater damage if they were a nuclear power. He seems to be the only leader who both acknowledges this and acts on that conviction. I suspect all the other leaders know this as well but none has the character to act. They are all weak, spineless men.

    I think Trump (everyone really) knows the left wing that controls the media narrative will always hate him until the next republican in which case – like GWB, George Bush, and RR, they will come to a strange new respect for him and decry the current Republican “literally worse than Hitler.” I think he is unconcerned about what the media will say about him but wants a legacy that he made the world more peaceful – as we see in the Abraham accords and as he hopes to achieve by neutralizing Iran.

    Clearly he loves Israel and clearly he loves America.

    #2573993

    keith > , they will come to a strange new respect for him and decry the current Republican

    an interesting idea. I also thought that he is being vilified while Reagan et al are now suddenly used as a positive contrast, while in his time, he was maligned the same way. But your statement is a clear corollary of that.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.