December 16, 2008 12:13 pm at 12:13 pm #1013089
I have seen many visually impaired frum people who have got a new lease of life as they have a Guide Dog. If dogs were not permitted these people would most certainly not have them.
There are many reasons why a person may own a dog such as land and property security etc.
I will not give a personal opinion here other than to say each to his own.December 16, 2008 1:07 pm at 1:07 pm #1013090
The Big One,
Thank you.December 16, 2008 1:42 pm at 1:42 pm #1013091
No, they don’t allow it. They say you shouldn’t have it. If you absolutely must have it, for work purposes, then you can, but only with a filter. Even then, it should be avoided as much as possible.
As for me, my Rav doesn’t assur it. The YU community doesn’t have any such ban.December 17, 2008 1:17 am at 1:17 am #1013092
feif, That is narishkeit and incorrect. If the site is kosher it can be accessed. The takanos would not prohibit a site like ywn. According to your abusrdity, ywn itself should not be allowed to exist. Read the takano again. If you’ve seen a different version that assurs ywn, please post it verbatim. It doesn;’t exist.
The only reason you may have claimed that is to knock off another posters legitimate point, that you couldn’t counter, so you came up with this baloney.December 17, 2008 2:59 pm at 2:59 pm #1013094
Why wasn’t my link to a pdf of the Lakewood takanos published? It supported what I wrote here. What’s wrong with it?December 17, 2008 4:37 pm at 4:37 pm #1013095
Will Hill, if the takanos dont prohibit kosher sites, why not just issue a takana against non-kosher sites?December 17, 2008 4:46 pm at 4:46 pm #1013096
noitallmr and dd ur so lucky! my mother is petrified of dogs but I wish I could have one! Maybe when I get married lolDecember 17, 2008 4:54 pm at 4:54 pm #1013097
This was a blog which YW Editor used to wrote on, so please post this message.
“Leading off was the rosh yeshiva Rabbi Malkiel Kotler who spoke about the necessity of erecting “walls”, safeguarding yourself and your children. “Don’t let cracks in that wall; don’t open any door!
Lakewood’s beloved mashgiach Rabbi Matisyahu Solomon ended off bemoaning how our generation is dancing with the satan and- “he’s spinning out of control with much excitement”, having gotten the internet in our homes.
Any heter, exclaimed the mashgiach, to posses the internet for parnasah is “B’Deyeved of B’Deyeved, adding: “I’d like to say something radical: maybe it is better to live in poverty than to give away your neshama- bring the internet in your house!”.
He warned everyone : “It has no place in a jewish home”,… “One picture can ruin a child for life.”,… “You don’t give children keys to your car”!”
That was said by the asifa. Even to earn a living, use of the internet was questionable. You want me to think they ok it with a filter?
There is a link to the takanos put out in Lakewood. It says that if you must have the internet for work only, you need a filter. It says nothing about allowing it to be used for non-work issues, even with a filter.December 17, 2008 9:02 pm at 9:02 pm #1013098
myshadow- im”y Bekorov!December 18, 2008 12:35 am at 12:35 am #1013099
Feif Un,Where did you learn evasion so well? For the umpteenth time you are being told that nowhere in the takana does it ban a site such as yw that is filtered. It does NOT ban filtered access for use on a Torah site, or personal e-mail, etc. even if it is not for business use. Nowhere does it say anything of the like.
10 people already pointed this out to you already, so go twist the words in the takana yet again…December 18, 2008 1:27 pm at 1:27 pm #1013100
Read it again, in section A.1:
“Current available filtering and restriction systems do not provide adequate protection and therefore the following takanos apply even in regard to computers with filtered or restricted Internet access.”
A bit later on:
“Parents may not have the Internet in the home unless it is l’tzorech parnasah, and have obtained written permission from one of the designated Rabbonim.”
So, it seems to me that there is no heter to use the Internet for a site like YWN – only for work. Basically, what you’re saying is, if you have it for work, it’s ok to use the internet for other things also. In effect, only someone who needs the internet for work is allowed to see YWN, other people aren’t allowed – the Rabbonim stated straight out that filtering software isn’t good enough, and you can’t have the internet with a filter if you don’t need it for work. Is that right?December 18, 2008 5:41 pm at 5:41 pm #1013101
How did we get from dogs to the Lakewood Internet Ban?
About dogs, I personally don’t care for them.
But apparently the Torah presupposes dogs being around in a Torah society to have a way of disposing slaughtered animals that fail the inspection for “Tarfus”.
I believe the sheep business needs them.
Now I get it: If you want to avoid the internet in your daily business (and do not have a rich father in law to support you in Kollel), then you become a shepherd and get a dog!!!December 18, 2008 8:26 pm at 8:26 pm #1013102
My sister got a “heter” from the Lakewood rabbanim because she is deaf and its her primary form of communication with family and friends.
I question this only because if the internet is that bad, why would this be acceptable? Technically, she can use a TTY/VCO system which is annoying, but if the internet “has no place in a Jewish home” how can this be allowed?
I’m not complaining because it makes communicating with my sister much easier, but just curious why this is allowed.May 16, 2009 10:39 pm at 10:39 pm #1013103
A lengthy and detailed article about halachic issues with pets can be found here. http://www.daat.ac.il/DAAT/english/halacha/jachter_1.htm
As the article points out, besides for the fact that most of the Gemara’s stringencies regarding dogs tend to hinge on the dog being “evil”, there is at least one instance, in Bava Kama, where the problem is only with security. It says that if you chain your dog so that he won’t damage property or frighten people, it’s completely permissible. Regarding other pets, the article cites two sugyas that have examples of children playing with birds and locusts. So apparently, having pets for recreational purposes (as opposed to service dogs) is fine.May 17, 2009 6:01 am at 6:01 am #1013104
The Shulchan Oruch 79:4 groups dog excrement together with pig excrement, and the Be’er Heitev says ‘Cursed is the Jew who grows pigs’
The Mishna Berura is more meikel, grouping a BAD dog together with pigs
Also, in Halacha, we know the concept of ‘water that is not drinkable by the standards of a dog’ for water that is posul or kosher for netilas yadayimMay 17, 2009 6:11 pm at 6:11 pm #1013106
The Be’er Heitev hates dogs 🙂
The Mishnah Berurah likes nice dogsMay 17, 2009 8:57 pm at 8:57 pm #1013107
ames you are right. The Be’er heitev probably meant animal excrement thMay 18, 2009 6:41 pm at 6:41 pm #1013108
Anyone that doesn’t have the patience to read through this thread, I suggest you read the first few posts, get the feel of the argument and then just read feivel’s posts- they are for the books! I never heard him so outwardly expressive before. It’s great and he proves a very good point- as usual
feivel- we’d love to see more of this side of you 🙂May 18, 2009 6:48 pm at 6:48 pm #1013109
You can say about any dog, “But it’s trained – it’s a nice dog!”
Most of the time there is something on the news about a dog attacking its owner or any other person, everyone says “But it was such a nice dog! I never would have thought it would attack anyone!” Then, of course, the animal psychologists get involved – they try to figure out why the dog attacked. Maybe it felt its owner was being threatened. Maybe it felt threatened itself.
The fact is, all these so-called “safe” dogs are just as capable of hurting someone.May 18, 2009 8:09 pm at 8:09 pm #1013110
“feivel- we’d love to see more of this side of you :)”
i appreciate it
but i have learned to be as quiet as possible hereMay 18, 2009 9:33 pm at 9:33 pm #1013111
we’ve noticed that you’ve been “burned” and now keep most of your thoughts to yourself. That’s why I’m telling you to “fof zei un”! It doesn’t matter what they think- you can have as much say as them.
bring it on full force!May 19, 2009 4:22 am at 4:22 am #1013114
ames, obviously you’re not referring to me. right?
~a~May 19, 2009 9:10 am at 9:10 am #1013115
Mods, what was wrong with my post?
Please review the rules of the CRMay 19, 2009 9:43 am at 9:43 am #1013116
Point taken. Sorry.May 19, 2009 2:26 pm at 2:26 pm #1013117
“feivel- we’d love to see more of this side of you :)”
i appreciate it
but i have learned to be as quiet as possible here
Olam hafuch huApril 24, 2014 12:40 am at 12:40 am #1013118
There is a rashi in the gemara pesachim which says every town should have a dog. Must be that it is not only permissible but obligated.April 24, 2014 2:21 am at 2:21 am #1013119
I find all the anti-dog posts appalling. Overall, the species has been kind to humanity, and as humans we are required to respect dogs and to allow others to keep them.April 25, 2014 4:17 am at 4:17 am #1013120
I. M. ShluffinParticipant
Never in all my life have I ever heard “issur” and “dog” in the same sentence. Call me ignorant, but I’ve never heard that a person can’t have a pet dog. Call me biased, though, cus I have a dog. Who happens to be uber-cute. And serves a holy purpose in our house:
Thanks to our dog, we’ve realized that the bar for ???? ?????? ??? is extremely low (our dog will eat anything but lox and pesach dog food);
Thanks to our dog, our family has learned the halachos of walking/petting/picking up a dog on Shabbos;
Thanks to our dog, we’ve made friends with every other person in our neighborhood who owns a dog;
Thanks to our dog, our kitchen floor rarely needs cleaning.
Thanks to our dog, we rarely feel lonely – there’s always a puppy at the end of a tough day 🙂
Thanks to our dog, I’ve learned how to act more pleasantly with humans, like my dog does. Sometimes. Seriously – I’ve learned from my dog’s middos. I’ve also learned how to deal with kids by dealing with and training my dog. Don’t judge – there’s good stuff you can learn from training a dog. Patience, requisite punishment, always end with a smile and a hug (or a tummy-rub), etc.
Soften up, everyone! I’m glad the posts have become more dog-appreciative than 4 years ago.April 25, 2014 5:12 am at 5:12 am #1013121
I.M. Shluffin: There’s a Chochmas Adam who thinks there’s an Issur of Chukas Akum to own 2 dogs (he says that having 1 can be good though as it helps teach you to be responsible).
Also, the Gemara is quite clear that it’s Assur to own a vicious dog because it’s Damim B’veisecha.April 25, 2014 11:15 am at 11:15 am #1013122
Whenever I see someone walking their dog on Shabbos I think to myself that Shabbos is far too holy a day to share it with a dog.April 25, 2014 1:32 pm at 1:32 pm #1013123
“Shabbos is far too holy a day to share it with a dog.”
Ah, yes, ignore the halachah regarding proper treatment of animals in the interest of holiness. Reject the opportunity to perform mitzvot regarding the care of animals in the interest of holiness.
I don’t think that this is what this week’s parsha is about.April 25, 2014 1:47 pm at 1:47 pm #1013124
I would love to have a dog, but several family members are allergic and/or afraid of them. And yes, Shabbos is a holy day, BUT I have known some dogs who seemed to be holier than some people with whom I am acquainted. As Tzaar baalei chaim is a chiyuv, and dogs cannot legally be left off-leash in many places, they require being walked on Shabbos. My parents O”H had a dog very late in life (I think I recounted that story once before, and won’t do so now), and he was their fierce protector, utterly loyal devoted to all of us, loving, and intuitive when something was wrong. How many people can have that said about them???April 25, 2014 3:13 pm at 3:13 pm #1013125
Charlie, you can accomplish that with a bird.April 25, 2014 3:29 pm at 3:29 pm #1013126
to me someone with a pet dog has a need for companionship, which shows that hes lacking in companionship, which shows he’s possibly got issues = most people with dogs are weird.April 25, 2014 5:25 pm at 5:25 pm #1013127
.. and thanks to the numerous dog in the area (and their selfish / careless owners), I have to have my eyes always glued to the ground while walking outside near my home.April 27, 2014 4:21 am at 4:21 am #1013128
i own dogs and i feel bad when the dog wants me to pet it on shabos and to the best of my understanding i can’t maybe im wrongApril 27, 2014 4:47 am at 4:47 am #1013129
Get a shabbos goy to pet the dog.April 27, 2014 4:52 am at 4:52 am #1013130
I think you are allowed to pet it. Find out. Just don’t lean on it or pick it up.April 27, 2014 5:09 am at 5:09 am #1013131
HaLeiVi: According to the M”B petting is a problem. Many are Meikel though, especially for dogowners (that was the P’sak in my community growing up; I couldn’t touch my friends’ dogs but they could touch their own).April 27, 2014 5:02 pm at 5:02 pm #1013132
Little Froggie: I used to have a neighbor with a bulldog who did not know what the word pooper-scooper meant. Luckily he moved away, and we can keep our eyes off the sidewalk.
But trust me- the geese in the park are worse…April 27, 2014 5:48 pm at 5:48 pm #1013133
The only prohibition is owning a vicious dog. Even then if one needs it for protection it is permitted so long as it is properly tied up (Shulchan Aruch Choshen Mishpat 409:3 and see Rema). As for being muktzeh, Rav Moshe says (Iggrot Moshe Orach Chayim 5,22) that if one normally pets and plays with it this is its purpose and it is not muktzeh. However, Sepharadim may hold differently (see Shulchan Aruch Orech Chaim 308:45 with Rema and Mishna Berura seif katan 158 regarding playing with a ball).April 28, 2014 4:49 pm at 4:49 pm #1013134
There are more vicious people than vicious dogs. You are more likely to be bitten by a person than by a dog. Most dogs are friendly, some of them too much so, but most “vicious” dogs are not actually vicious but were abused by vicious humans and learned to hate humans altogether.
By the way, one is permitted to own a vicious dog as long as it is confined.April 28, 2014 5:10 pm at 5:10 pm #1013135
rebyidd: That’s good for most breeds, but it’s hard to claim that a pit bull or a mostly-wolf husky (huskie?) is a domestic dog. In fact, the experts say that these breeds aren’t domesticable.April 28, 2014 6:14 pm at 6:14 pm #1013136
I’m thinking of starting a topic called “Jesse Owens’ Dogs.” Does anyone have any misinformation about that?April 28, 2014 9:13 pm at 9:13 pm #1013137
A mostly-wolf dog is a part-dog wolf, not a dog. And pit bulls are an exception with exceptions of its own.April 29, 2014 3:05 pm at 3:05 pm #1013138
charliehall – in reponse to your post – there is no halacha that says that I must own a dog or any other animal. therefore if i dont own one I am not responsible for its well being. Tzaar Baal Chayim prevents me from abusing or torturing. so I prefer to spend my holy shabbos with family, friends, seforim, shul and a shabbos meal – not with a dog.April 29, 2014 8:16 pm at 8:16 pm #1013139
But let me and my spaniel(s?) live in peace.April 30, 2014 3:23 pm at 3:23 pm #1013140
Can anyone explain the difference between Jews owning dogs and a Jew-owning dog?April 30, 2014 5:36 pm at 5:36 pm #1013141
If you are allowed to help your animal walk because of Tzaar Baalei Chayim, why shouldn’t you be able to pet it as long as you don’t lift it?April 30, 2014 5:38 pm at 5:38 pm #1013142
Some don’t hold of this Minhag of owning a dog and think of it as Chukos Hagoyim. Others say you can be Yotzei with fish. I’m trying to be Yotzei with money.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.