Joining Chabad

Home Forums Rants Joining Chabad

Viewing 50 posts - 251 through 300 (of 497 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1700457
    Chossid
    Participant

    ๐ŸซSyag Lchochma
    Thanks for speaking up and saying it’s wrong to accuse us for davaning to the Rebbe.
    The thing is not only it’s not true, it’s outrageous for someone to think that we do, because the more you learn about Hashem and the way he creates the world every second……. The more you understand how the only person you should serve is Hashem himself.

    The question is who spreads these lies together with a bunch of other ones about Chabad?.

    “however, to say โ€ with the rebbes helpโ€ in place of โ€œbezras Hashemโ€ (and other similar switcharoos) and that IS said and is definitely very much attributing Hashems kochoc to a person.”

    We don’t ื—”ื• replace Hashem with Rebbe ื—”ื•.
    Hashem gave a tzdik certain choichois to give brochois, and one of thing a Rebbe does is that worries about his chassidish…
    We say ื‘ืขื–ืจืช ื”’, when someone says that the Rebbe will help it’s not replacing Hashem ื—”ื• in any shape or form, we are just saying that the Rebbe will ask by Hashem to give us beochios. The only one that can give a refuah is Hashem himself, but tzdikim have the power to drawdown brochois. That’s why we go to rabbeim/tzdikim to ask for brochois, and daven by their kaver, Not that they’re Hashem ื—”ื•, rather that they have the power to drawn down the brochois from Hashem. Since they have a heilikeh neshoma.

    “You keep telling him to stop saying lโ€h. Why are you not understanding that if *his* own rabbeim tell him that chabad practices aโ€z, then reagrdless of what YOUR opinion is, he is *obligated* to speak badly about it to deter others from buying into it. You should not be having trouble understanding that”

    I think I have explained myself already, but I will try again.

    First if you want people not to come to Lubavitche you should explain to them how special he is that he grew up litvish, (it’s basics of yeddishkiet that if you want to feel special, you bring up yourself and not put down others.) And that is the source of the persons problem, he feels that the litvishe outlook one life is not positive ect. So if you want to him not to come to Chabad, you go to the root of the problem, and explain how special the litviss derech is. And not put down Lubavitche. And if you can’t explain it to him then I guess there’s a problem.

    Second If LerntminTayrah quotes a godols words with explanation why we are violating the 13 ekrei hoamuna, ovid avoda zorah, Lev tohor, compare to Christians, and all the rest of the nonsense taeinois that he has, then i can’t have teinois on the the godol, (whether I agree or not), but if he doesn’t quote a godol and a source with an explanation, and can’t answer my questions then he is saying straight out loshen hara (which it doesn’t look like he cares about) or he got to take back his teinois. (Which he hasn’t yet)
    Hope you understand, just trying to be reasonable.

    Just because you hear radical stuff about Lubavitche it doesn’t means it’s true, not every Joe schmo can have an opinion, and second if you hear something you don’t like it’s only normal if you are sincere to ask about it and find out exactly what it’s means, and not come up with your own conclusions, rather go and ask a well respected Lubavitcher for explanation.

    There is so many leis about chabad (like you yourself see) and you should think twice before you post a comment online that stays there forever, tat is loshen hara.
    It’s a terrible synonym ื›ืœ ื”ืžืกืคืจ ืœืฉื•ืŸ ื”ืจืข ื›ืื™ืœื• ื›ื•ืคืจ ื‘ืขื™ืงืจ.

    I hope you understand.

    #1700480

    how the only person you should serve is Hashem himself.

    Hashem is not ch”v a person.

    #1700497
    yehoshuaahron
    Participant

    That’s exactly the problem, how you misconstrue everything, you know he didn’t mean Hashem is person. No one in Chabad believe I any sort of kfirah nor say anything that sounds like kfirah, if you lechatchila have a bias irrational hate against Chabad or any group, you’ll find a way to twist everything.

    #1700509
    yehoshuaahron
    Participant

    The Rebbe is ben achar ben from Dovid Hamelech through Shalom Shachna Altschuler (Tzemach Tzedek’s father) , an ainekel of the Metztudas Dovid (Dovid Altschuler), who in turn is ben achar ben from Dovid Hamelech.

    #1700511
    BneiBarakObama
    Participant

    Dropping by for a second.

    #1700514
    BneiBarakObama
    Participant

    Chossid, does Atzmus care about you? Yes or No. Pick 1.

    #1700515
    Non Political
    Participant

    @ Chossid

    “Just because you hear radical stuff about Lubavitche it doesnโ€™t means itโ€™s true”

    Are you serious? This isn’t a matter of some unfortunate souls who have bought into some urban legend. People are bothered by things they know from personal experiences. Many people. Many experiences.

    Among other things (in no particular order) it is not ok

    to attempt to whitewash statements like “Let’s do Mitzvos to make the Rebbe happy” or “Let’s do this Mitzva like the Rebbe commanded” or “The Rebbe should help us” ect.

    to think it is perfectly fine to stick pictures of the last Lubavitcher Rebbe (and only his picture) in every room of the house and children’s strollers on the grounds of ื™ื”ื™ื• ืขื™ื ื™ืš ืจื•ืื•ืช ืืช ืžื•ืจื™ืš

    to take isolated quotes from the NH out of content to claim that Rav Chaim Volozhiner is basing the NH on the Tanya

    to try and pass off as normative Jewish thought and practice the fixation on the possibility of ones Rav / Rebbe being Moshiach to the extent found today in Chabbad.

    to make the laughable claim that the objection to declaring a false moshiach is an innovation of the maskilim

    to keep asking, with innocent wide eyed wonder, for names of Gedolim who came out publicly against the last Lubavitcher Rebbe when such names and their respective statements have been provided by multiple posters on multiple past threads and are publically available to anyone who care to run a google search.
    .

    #1700532
    RSo
    Participant

    yehoshuaahron: “The Rebbe is ben achar ben from Dovid Hamelech through Shalom Shachna Altschuler (Tzemach Tzedekโ€™s father) , an ainekel of the Metztudas Dovid (Dovid Altschuler), who in turn is ben achar ben from Dovid Hamelech.”

    Wonderful claims, but other than that your rebbe was ben achar ben from the Tzemach Tzedek and that he was a son of Reb Shalom Shachna (possibly Altschuler – I don’t know any info about that) the rest is without any basis or proof.

    In fact, I took a break and checked Hebrew Wikipedia for information on the Metzudas Dovid – you can find the page under ื“ื•ื“ ืืœื˜ืฉื•ืœืจ – and despite it explaining his family and ancestors at length there is absolutely no mention of him being a descendant of Dovid Hamelech.

    So rather than saying that “the rest is without any basis or proof” I would prefer to say it is another instance of lubavich revisionist fiction. And who believes it? Anyone who cares more about “being on the winning side” than the truth.

    At least S”T ym”sh was accepted as being descended from Dovid Hamelech…

    #1700544
    Chatzkel todres
    Participant

    ืจื•ืื™ื ืžื›ืœ ื”ื ื›ืชื‘ ืฉื”ืฉื ืื” ืžืงื•ืœืงืœืช ื”ืฉื•ืจื”. ื•ืœื›ืš ื›ืœ ืžื” ืฉื™ืขื ื• ืœื ื™ืกืคื™ืง. ื•ืœื›ืš ืื•ืœื™ ืžื˜ืก ืฉืœื ื ื’ื™ื‘ ืืš ื“ื ืขืงื ืžื•ืฆื™ืื™ื ืฉื ืจืข ืขืœ ืขื“ื” ืžื™ืฉืจืืœ ื•ื•ืžื–ืœื–ืœื™ื ื‘ื›ื‘ื•ื“ ืืจื–ื™ ื”ืœื‘ื ื•ืŸ ืื“ื™ืจื™ื ื”ืชื•ืจื” ืœื“ื•ืจื•ืชื™ื”ื ื•ืืกื•ืจ ืœืฉืชื•ืง.
    ืืœื• ื”ืžื›ื•ื ื™ื ืžืชื ื’ื“ื™ื ืชืžื™ื“ ื˜ืขื ื• ื”ื—ืกื™ื“ื™ื ืื™ื ื ืขืœ ืคื™ ืชื•ืจื”. ื‘ืจื ื”ื•ื•ืืจื˜ ืฉืœ ื”ื—ืช”ืก ืฉื—ื“ืฉ ืืกื•ืจ ืžืŸ ื”ืชื•ืจื” ื‘ื” ื‘ืฉืขื” ืฉื”ื•ื ืžืฆื˜ื˜ ืžืกืคืจ ื”ืชื ื™ื. ื•ื‘ืขืœ ื‘ืช ื”ื™ื ืงื“ืžื• ื‘ื–ืžืŸ ื•ื‘ืžืขืœื”. ื˜ืขื ืช ืฉ”ืฆ ื™ืž”ืฉ ื”ื™ื” ื‘ื”ืชื—ืœื” ื‘ื” ื‘ืฉืขื” ืฉืืœื• ืฉืœื—ืžื• ื•ืžืชื—ื• ื”ืคืจืื ืงื™ืกื˜ื™ื ื™ืž”ืฉ ื”ื™ื” ื”ื‘ืขืฉ”ื˜ ืœืชืœืžื™ื“ื™ื•.
    ืืœื• ืฉื ื”ื™ื• ื—ืกื™ื“ื™ื• ื”ื™ื• ืžื‘ื™ื ื™ื”ื ืžื’ื“ื•ืœื™ ื”ื“ื•ืจื•ืช ืžืžืœื ืžืงื•ืžื• ื”ืžื’ื™ื“ื”ื’ื“ื•ืœ ืžืžืขื–ืจื™ื˜ืฉ ืฉื”ื™ื” ื—ื‘ืจื•ืชื ืฉืœ ื‘ืคื ื™ ื™ื”ื•ืฉืข ื•ืจื‘ื™ ื—ื™ื™ื ืจืคืคื•ืจื˜ ื‘ืชื•ืœื“ื•ืช ื™ืขืงื‘ ื™ื•ืกืฃ ื•ืขื•ื“.
    ืชื•ืจืช ื‘ืขืœ ื”ืชื ื™ื ื›ืœ ื–ืžืŸ ืฉืœื ื™ื“ืขื• ื“ื–ืžื” ืžืžื ื• ืืคื™ืœื• ื”ื’ืจ”ื ืืžืจ ืฉืจืง ืžืœืืš ืืœืงื™ื ืฆื‘ื-ื•ืช ื™ื›ื•ืœ ืœื›ืชื‘ื• ื•ืืฃ ื”ื“ืคื™ืกื• ื‘ื™”ื“ ืฉืงืœืื•ื• ื•ื’ื™ืจื™ ื“ื™ืœื”ื• ื”ืœื›ื•ืช ืชืœืžื•ื“ ืชื•ืจื”ืฉืœื•. ื•ืขื•ื“ ื•ืขื•ื“ ื•ื‘ื–ืžืŸ ื”ืฆ”ืฆ ืจ’ื™ืฆื—ืง ืžื•ื•ืืœืื–ื™ืŸ ืขื‘ื“ ื™ื“ ืื—ืช ืืชื•. ื•ื‘ื–ืžืŸ ื”ืจื‘ื™ ืจืฉ”ื‘ ืจ’ ื—ื™ื™ื ื‘ืจื™ืกืงืจ ืขื‘ื“ ืืชื• ื•ื’ื ื”ื—ืคืฅ ื—ื™ื™ื ื•ืขื“ ื›ื“ื™ ื›ืš ืฉืคืขื ื ื–ืฃ ื‘ืžืืŸ ื“ื”ื• ืฉื“ื™ื‘ืจ ื ื’ื“ ื”ืจื‘ื™ ื‘ืืžืจื• ืฉืžื™ ืฉืžื“ื‘ืจ ื ื’ื“ื• ื›ืื™ืœื• ืžื“ื‘ืจ ืžืฉื” ืจื‘ื™ื ื• ื•ืขื•ื“… ื ืžืฉื™ืš ืžื—ืจ ืžืงื•ืฆืจ ื”ื–ืžืŸ ื•ื”’ ื™ื‘ืจืš ืืช ืขืžื• ื‘ืฉืœื•ื. ืฉ

    #1700545
    Chatzkel todres
    Participant

    ืœื”ืขื™ืจ ืฉืจื‘ื™ื ื• ื”ืงื“ื•ืฉ ืœื ื”ื™ื” ื‘ืŸ ืื—ืจ ื‘ืŸ ืืฃ ืขืœ ืคื™ ื›ืŸ ืืžืจ ืจื‘ ืื™ ืžืŸ ื—ื™ื™ ืจื‘ื™ื ื• ื”ืงื“ื•ืฉ ื•ื–ื” ื•ื“ืื™ ืฉื“ืจืš ืืžื• ื”ื•ื ืžื‘ืขืœ ื”ืชื ื™ื ืฉื”ื•ื ื ื›ื“ ื‘ืŸ ืื—ืจ ื‘ืŸ ืžื”ืžื”ืจ”ืœ ืฉื”ื™ื” ื‘ืŸ ืื—ืจ ื‘ืŸ. ื’ื ื”ืจื‘ื™ ืจืฉ”ื‘ ืืžืจ ื‘ืื—ื“ ืžืฉื™ื—ื•ืชื™ื• ืžื™ืจ ื–ื™ื™ื ืขืŸ ื“ืจืš ืคื•ืŸ ื‘ื™ืช ื“ื•ื“ ื”ื•ื ืœื ื”ื™ื” ืฉืงืจืŸ … ื”

    #1700572
    yehoshuaahron
    Participant

    ืจื‘ื™ ืฉืœื•ื ืฉื›ื ื (ืื‘ื™ ืื“ืžื•”ืจ ื”ืฆืžื— ืฆื“ืง) ื”ื™ื” ืžื’ื–ืข ืฉืœ ื”ืžืฆื•ื“ืช ื“ื•ื“, ืฉื”ื™ื” ืฆืืฆื ืฉืœ ื“ื•ื“ ื”ืžืœืš, ื‘ืŸ ืื—ืจ ื‘ืŸ.

    ื”ืžืงื•ืจ ืœื›ืš ื”ื•ื ื”ืจื‘ ื™ืฉืขื™ื” ื”ื•ืจื•ื•ื™ืฅ (ื‘ืŸ ื”ืจื‘ ืืฉืจ ื™ื—ื–ืงืืœ, ื‘ืŸ ื”ืจื‘ ื™ืฉืขื™ื” ืฉื ืฉื ืœืืฉื” ืืช ื‘ืช ืื—ื•ืชื• ืฉืœ ืื“ืžื•”ืจ ื”ืฆ”ืฆ, ื‘ืกืคืจื• ‘ืขื“ืŸ ืฆื™ื•ืŸ’ ืขืž’ ืงืกื.): “ืฉืžืขืชื™ ืžื”ื ื–ืœื””ื”, ืืฉืจ ื–ืงื ื™ื ื• [ืื‘ื™ ืื‘ื™ื• ืฉืœ ื”ืฆ”ืฆ] ื””ืจ ื ื—, ื”ื™ื” ืฉื ื›ื™ื ื•ื™ ืžืฉืคื—ืชื• ืืœื˜ืฉื•ืœืขืจ ื›ื™ ื”ื™ื” ืžื’ื–ืข ื”ืจื””ื’ ืจ’ ื™ื—ื™ืืœ ื”ืœืœ ื‘ืŸ ื”ืจื‘ ืจ’ ื“ื•ื“ ืืœื˜ืฉื•ืœืขืจ ืžืง”ืง ื™ืื‘ืจื•ื‘ ืืฉืจ ืืกืฃ ืคื™ืจื•ืฉื™ ืื‘ื™ื• ืขืœ ื ”ืš ื•ื”ื•ืกื™ืฃ ืขืœื™ื”ื ืžื—ื›ืžืชื• ื•ื”ื™ื• ืœืื—ื“ื™ื ื‘ื™ื“ื• ื‘ืฉื ืžืฆื•ื“ืช ืฆื™ื•ืŸ ื•ืžืฆื•ื“ืช ื“ื•ื“”. ืขื›”ืœ.
    “ืคื™ืจื•ืฉื• “ืžื’ื–ืข:
    ืฉื”ื•ื ื”ื™ื” ื‘ืŸ ื“ื•ื“ื• ืฉืœ ื”ืžืฆื•ื“ืช ื“ื•ื“ ืื• ื‘ื“ื•ืžื”, ื•ื–ื”ื• ื›ื•ื•ื ืชื• “ืฉื”ื™ื” ืžื’ื–ืข ื‘ืขืœ ื”ืžืฆื•ื“ืช ื“ื•ื“”. ื•ืœืคื™ ื–ื” ื ืžืฆื ืฉื”ื•ื ื’ื ื›ืŸ ื”ื™ื” ื‘ืŸ ืื—ืจ ื‘ืŸ ืœื“ื•ื“ ื”ืžืœืš, ื›ืžื• ื”ืžืฆื•ื“ืช ื“ื•ื“.

    #1700616
    yehoshuaahron
    Participant

    ื“ื•ื“ ืืœื˜ืฉื•ืœืจ – ื•ื™ืงื™ืคื“ื™ื”

    “ืกื™ื‘ืช ื›ื ื•ื™ ื”ืžืฉืคื—ื” ื”ื–ืืช ืืœื˜ืฉื•ืœืจ, ื•ื”ื™ื ื›ื™ ื›ื•ืœื ื”ื™ื• ื’ืื•ื ื™ ื•ื—ืกื™ื“ื™ ื“ื•ืจ ื“ื•ืจ, ื•ืžืงื•ื ืžื•ืœื“ืชื ื”ื™ื” ื‘ืคื•ืจื˜ื•ื’ืืœ; ื•ืื—ืจื™ ืืฉืจ ื’ืœื• ืžืฉื ื‘ืขืช ื”ื’ื™ืจื•ืฉ, ื ืฉืื• ืขื™ืžื ืื‘ื ื™ื ืžื‘ืชื™ ื›ื ืกื™ื•ืช ืฉื‘ื”, ืœืงื™ื™ื “ื›ื™ ืจืฆื• ืขื‘ื“ื™ืš ืืช ืื‘ื ื™ื””. ื•ื›ืืฉืจ ื‘ืื• ืœืคืจืื’ ื•ืงื‘ืขื• ืžืฉื›ื ื ื‘ื” … ื‘ื ื• ืœื”ื ื‘ื™ืช ื›ื ืกืช, ื•ืฉืžื• ื‘ืขืฆืžื ืœืชื•ืš ื”ื‘ื ื™ืŸ [ืืช] ื”ืื‘ื ื™ื ืืฉืจ ื”ื‘ื™ืื• ืื™ืชื. ื•ื™ืขืŸ ื”ื™ื• ื”ืื‘ื ื™ื ืžื‘ืชื™ ื›ื ืกื™ื•ืช ื™ืฉื ื™ื, ืœื›ืŸ ื ืงืจืื• ืืœื˜ืฉื•ืœืจ [ืืœื˜ โ€“ ื™ืฉืŸ, ืฉื•ืœ โ€“ ื‘ื™ืช ื›ื ืกืช]; ื•ืžืฉื ื ืคืฆื• ืขืœ ืคื ื™ ื”ืืจืฅ.”

    ื”ื›ื•ื•ื ื”, ื›ื›ืœ ื”ื ืจืื”, ืœื‘ื™ืช ื”ื›ื ืกืช “ืืœื˜ื ื•ื™ ืฉื•ืœ” ื”ื™ื“ื•ืข ืฉื‘ืคืจืื’[3].

    ืžืฉืคื—ืชื• ืฉืœ ืจ’ ื“ื•ื“ ื”ื™ื™ืชื” ืžื™ื•ื—ืกืช ืœืžืฉืคื—ืช ื—ื™ื•ืช โ€“ ื”ื•ื ื”ื™ื” ื ื›ื“ื• ืฉืœ ืจ’ ืžื ื—ื ืžืื ื™ืฉ ื—ื™ื•ืช, ืจื‘ื” ืฉืœ ื•ื•ื™ืœื ื, ืฉื”ื™ื” ื‘ื ื• ืฉืœ ืจ’ ื™ืฆื—ืง ื—ื™ื•ืช ื”ืจืืฉื•ืŸ, ืžื—ื‘ืจ ืกืคืจ “ืืคื™ ืจื‘ืจื‘ื™” (“ืคื ื™ ื™ืฆื—ืง”) ื•ืจื‘ืŸ ืฉืœ ืœื‘ื•ื‘ (ืœืžื‘ืจื’), ืงืจืืงื ื•ืคืจืื’; ื’ื ืกื‘ื• ืฉืœ ืจ’ ื™ืฆื—ืง, ืจ’ ืคืชื—ื™ื” ื—ื™ื•ืช, ื”ื™ื” ืื‘”ื“ ืคืจืื’. ืขื•ื“ ื”ืชื™ื™ื—ืกื” ื”ืžืฉืคื—ื” ืœืจื‘ื™ ื™ื•ืกืฃ ื›”ืฅ ืจื‘ื” ืฉืœ ืงืจืืงื (ื”’ืจืข”ื, 1510 – ื”’ืฉื ”ื, 1591), ืžื—ื‘ืจ ืกืคืจ “ืฉืืจื™ืช ื™ื•ืกืฃ”; ืœืจื‘ื™ ื™ื—ื™ืืœ ืžื™ื›ืœ ืžื ืžื™ืจื•ื‘, ืจื‘ ื‘ื ืžื™ืจื•ื‘ ื•ืžื—ื‘ืจ ื”ืกืคืจ ื”ื”ืœื›ืชื™ ืฉื‘ืจื™ ืœื•ื—ื•ืช, ืืฉืจ ื ืจืฆื— ื‘ื’ื–ื™ืจื•ืช ืช”ื— ื•ืช”ื˜ (1648); ื•ืœื‘ืขืœ ื”ืฉ”ืš (ื”’ืฉืค”ื‘, 1622 – ื”’ืชื›”ื’, 1663). ื”ืžืงื•ืจ ื”ืงื“ื•ื ืฉืœ ื”ืžืฉืคื—ื” ื”ื•ื ื‘ืคืจื•ื‘ืื ืก ืฉื‘ืฆืจืคืช.

    ืื‘ื™ื• ืฉืœ ืจ’ ื“ื•ื“, ืจ’ ืืจื™ื” ืœื™ื‘ ืืœื˜ืฉื•ืœืจ ื‘ื ื• ืฉืœ ืจ’ ืคืชื—ื™ื” ืžืคืจืื’, ื”ื™ื” ืžื—ืฉื•ื‘ื™ ื”ืขื™ืจ ื™ืื‘ืจื•ื‘, ื•ื›ื›ืœ ื”ื ืจืื” ื”ื™ื” ืื—ื™ื• ืฉืœ ืจ’ ื™ื—ื™ืืœ ืžื™ื›ืœ ืืœื˜ืฉื•ืœืจ, ื‘ืขืœ ืกืคืจ “ืžืฉื ืช ืœื—ื”. ื’ื ืจ’ ื“ื•ื“ ืฉื™ืžืฉ ื‘ืชืคืงื™ื“ ื ื›ื‘ื“ ื‘ื™ืื‘ืจื•ื‘, ื•ื›ื‘ืจ ื‘ืฉื ืช ืชืค”ื• (ื›ืฉื”ื•ื ืคื—ื•ืช ืžื‘ืŸ ืืจื‘ืขื™ื) ื”ื•ื ื ื–ื›ืจ ื›ื“ื™ื™ืŸ ืื• ืจื‘ ื‘ืขื™ืจ. ื ืจืื” ืฉืœืื—ืจ ืžื›ืŸ ื”ืžืฉื™ืš ื‘ืžืกื•ืจืช ื”ืžืฉืคื—ืชื™ืช ื•ื›ื™ื”ืŸ ื’ื ื›ืจื‘ื” ืฉืœ ืคืจืื’.

    #1700651

    you know he didnโ€™t mean Hashem is person

    I’m aware that it wasn’t intentional, but still feel it needed to be corrected.

    #1700763
    jdf007
    Participant

    @Neville ChaimBerlin post #1698545 regarding rural NJ or NY and others
    Because while everyone else is fleeing the Northeast, we don’t understand how you can stay up there. The history of the US is filled with various groups building their own towns everywhere. Granted, it was easier back before an overbearing government unlike now.
    ***
    You can go out to any town in the South or the West and lone Jewish merchants set up shop in the 1800’s and practically founded the local economy. Some towns were said to be downright excited when a Jewish dry goods store came and opened. Without the Chabad house of today on the college campus or just plain hicksville, what of their few descendants? Just ignore them and let them vanish? I see these arguments in other threads about intermarriage, and in 10 more years it’ll likely be too late.
    While certain “denominations” are “converting” people en masse, is it really a worthy discussion to state that we should let the Jewish community of Hicksville Nebraska expire? This argument is diametrically opposed to the Rebbe who sought to rekindle Judaism after the Holocaust. Historically, this wasn’t even a popular argument even before the War.

    #1700812
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Chossid, Rav Hershel Shachter’s opinion on Chabad can be heard in his wonderful lecture on segulos and superstitions which is easily available online.

    All you have to do is google “daven to rebbe” and you will come up with people who say that, forget about my sources.

    All you have to do is google “rebbe god”.
    And no, saying der rebbe vet hefn means Rebbe as God. It’s using Rebbe as intermediary, the EXACT thing the Rambam says was early avoda zara, and what the meforshim say the mistake of the eigel was. Chabad goes back thousands of years to the maaseh eigel. The Jews knew Hashem created the world, just though they needed an intermediary.

    For any chabadsker who is willing to answer:
    1. What was the question that the Rebbe in 1979 wanted to answer with “atzmus umahus melubash baguf”?
    2. What were the answers that the Rebbe didn’t like?
    3. How did atzmus umahus melubash beguf answer the question?
    4. a superficial translation is that Hashem in a human body chalila, which sounds EXACTLY like Christianity. They should sue for plagiarism, along with the idea of dying and being resurrected messiah
    Yes I know a typical neshama is chelek Eloka but yet nobody ever said you can daven to a human until the Rebbe.

    Oy! Der eigel vet helfn

    #1700820
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    What is the practical difference between saying “The Rebbe will help” and “The eigel will help”?

    #1700827

    Chofetz Chaim writes explicitly in Tiferes Adam that the custom is not to allow any type of utensil to cut to shorten the beard and that since that was the accepted minhag yisroel it has the force of a prohibition.

    But the Chofetz Chaim is only followed when it fits with our lifestyle! Letโ€™s find fault in others. It makes us feel better than examining ourselves.

    (Mainly yeshiva bochurim don’t grow beards. Married sometimes/often do. Bochurim are pottur from all mitzvos till they get marries and start growing beards if they consider themselves gedolim).

    And the abridged mincha that the Bais Yossef says is improper (even for sefardim) – who cares!

    But let’s point fingers at “those” guys!

    Those guys donโ€™t sleep in a sukkah and eat cake before davening!

    #1700846
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Can any Chabdsker please explain this line tom e?
    “er, der rebbe un der aibershter zeinen ein zach”

    Which translates as “the Rebbe and Hashem are one thing”, from the atzmus teshuva?

    I mean it sounds like straight-up heresy to me. It fit into saying “The Rebbe will help” but not into Yiddishkeit.

    And if you believe in it, why not just request from the Rebbe directly instead of asking him to ask Hashem?

    And if not, then you hold your own Rebbe is an apikoires just like us. So why be Chabad?

    #1700851
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    As for the loshon hara, it’s not lashon hara to tell people to avoid avoda zara. Ein lecha toeles gedola mizu.

    #1700855
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    Is it lashon hara to tell people not to hoin Jews for Yoshke or similar groups?

    Was it lashon hara when people warned others about Shabsai Tzvi?

    Was it lashon hara when the Pharisees (the “snags of their day) warned people not to fall for Yoshke’s shtick?

    #1700931

    Wow rebbitzen, it took 4 attempts to get that through but you finally did it!

    #1700981

    Mod 29,

    Your assumptions regarding why your posts were deleted are incorrect, your language is extreme, claiming your “truths” are being silenced….is truth in the eye of the poster?

    Opposing hatred with hatred brings question to your motives. All posts resembling yours, regardless who they supported, were deleted as well. You just wouldn’t have known about them.

    #1701203

    At night, when there is a full moon, many report that there is an increase of human insanity. Outdoors, in the dark of the night, the orb of the moon is full and bright. Dogs howl at it, disturbed by it’s illumination. We are living in a dark world. The sun of the illumination of past Gedolim has set. There is little light, but for the full moon of those who are mekarev Yidden back to yiddishkeit as we await the dawning of the sunrise of Moshiach and the Geulah. Yet, some are disturbed by the moon, and the light it shines on the dark world. They complain, criticize and seek to blot out the moon, but alas, it is beyond their reach. They raise their voices with all their might while hospitals report an increase of insanity on those nights with a full moon. As we await dawn.

    #1701214
    Chossid
    Participant

    Sorry, for some reason I stopped getting the emails
    Correction: …….The more you understand how the only
    ONE you should serve is Hashem himself.

    #1701489
    ModernMisnaged
    Participant

    @RebbitzenGoldenpickanicerscreenname, “But the Chofetz Chaim is only followed when it fits with our lifestyle!”
    Just in case you don’t know, that’s not how Halacha works. There’s no “Supreme Authority” that decides all the Halachos. They’re all up for debate, and have been for Millenia. Klal Yisrael is not a Hasidic Dynasty with a “Supreme Leader” over it, that decides all the aspects of daily living. We go from Tanach, on to Mishna, then to Talmud, Then to meforshim and poskim, e.g. Rabbeinu Tam, Rambam, Tur, Etc. And FYI, Reb Moshe was Mattir Electric Shavers, and so was Rav Belsky. Furthermore, in Shulchan Halevi, page 127, Rav Belsky argues that had the Chofetz Chaim seen our Shavers, he would be Mattir it.

    #1701514

    Sure there is a “hetter” and of course there are “kulos” that a person can rely on. Just as there are hetterim for not sleeping in a sukah or eating cake before davening – but to adopt the shaving as a derech…just like the adopting of a “heicha kedusha” as a seder l’chatchila…I am not saying that shaving is “against” halacha but neither is not sleeping in a sukah or eating cake before davening….yet when we point at others, there are four fingers pointing to ourselves.

    #1701516

    You gotta love that the shavers rely on Reb Moshe while they use the eruv in NYC and Flatbush and BoroPark. because when it comes to eruv, Reb Moshe is not the final say…collect kulos from every maykil…but point fingers a those that don’t sleep in a sukah (gasp!) or eat cake before davening (double gasp!).

    #1701517
    Chossid
    Participant

    LerntminTayrah
    You have questions, or facts?
    You interested in answers or just interested in mocking?
    You definitely don’t seem like you want to hear any clarification.
    If you’re sincere you would go and ask someone in person your concerns, and learn the subject well.
    I think you need some help in the concept of Moishe Rabbiu, and eigul, why one is avoida Zara and one isn’t when asking for help. And in general what’s the role of a Rabbe.
    And why by davaning by any tzadiks kever is not avoida Zara.
    And again if you can’t back up ALL your “facts”, it’s considered loshen Hara, really sorry for you.
    Wondering which godol said that we are like Christians like you compare us too? (I’m clueless) and why would you take his opinion over everyone else’s opinion?

    #1701527

    You gotta love that the shavers rely on Reb Moshe while they use the eruv in NYC and Flatbush and BoroPark.

    Who does that? The Litvaks don’t use the eruv, and chassidim don’t shave. Besides, unless someone is a talmid muvhak, they don’t necessarily follow one posek for everything.

    And don’t belittle being mevatel the mitzvah of sukkah, it the issur of eating before davening. They’re both wrong.

    #1701520
    Chossid
    Participant

    But great questions LerntminTayrah and I advise you to go over to a well-respected Lubavitcher and ask him your questions.
    Maybe ask Rabbi YY Jacobson, he’s a well-respected Lubavitcher in the litvish world

    #1701533

    You interested in answers or just interested in mocking?

    He holds it’s a”z. So mocking is a mitzvah.

    If youโ€™re sincere you would go and ask someone in person your concerns

    If you’re sincere, go ask R’ Aharon Feldman in person.

    #1701536

    Chossid – i understand why you dont like what he has to say, but you cannot keep accusing everyone of mocking and hate. It isn’t about hate, it is about watching people do things we know to be wrong, and teaching people all over the world to do so as well. If the roles were reversed you would do the same. Argue the points all you want but stop accusing everyone who sees your answers as weak of hating.

    #1701548
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “But the Chofetz Chaim is only followed when it fits with our lifestyle!”

    I know you meant that to be condescending, but it’s actually a pretty non-controversial statement. There are all sorts of cases where Chabad doesn’t follow the Shulchan Aruch HaRav to the letter; I’ve had some pretty good, informative conversations with Sechel on here about why that is.

    Have you ever met anyone who follows one sefer of collected halachah for all minhagim? Have you ever heard anyone say, “my mother’s mesora was Minhag Kitzur, but my father came from a minhag Be’er Heiteiv family?” It’s also not controversial to observe that we posken a lot of issues different in America than we did before (psst, Chabad also did this). What’s the big deal? Also, you surely realize the electric razor didn’t exist back then, right?

    #1701550
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Chossid:
    “Maybe ask Rabbi YY Jacobson, heโ€™s a well-respected Lubavitcher in the litvish world”
    I doubt you’ll answer this since I’m clearly on the enemy team, but how respected is he in the Lubavitch world? He trims his beard, doesn’t he? (No motzi shem ra intended if I’m incorrect).

    #1701575
    RSo
    Participant

    yehoshuaahron, am I missing something. I wrote that the there is no source that the Metzudas Dovid was a descendant of Dovid Hamelech, so you quote the entire (I think) article of Wikipedia, which I referenced, and it makes no mention of it either. You also quote a great-great-nephew of the Tzemach Tzedek saying that the TT’s grandfather was “migeza” the Metzudas Dovid, and then you go on to explain that that means he was somehow related.

    Where is the connection to Dovid Hamelech, other than what Chatzkeltodres wrote that the Rashab allegedly said that “we are from Beis Dovid”?

    And rebbetzinwhat’shername, the issue isn’t so much not sleeping in the sukkah as in saying that it is the best way of acting when the Gemoro and ALL poskim (including the Baal Hatanya) say otherwise.

    The same with eating before Shachris where it is permitted for someone who is feeling weak, and not as a blanket minhag.

    #1701577
    Anyusernameopen?
    Participant

    Also very respected in lubavitch – btw hes a genius
    As far as I know He Doesn’t trim he’s beard
    But who am I to know

    Vos epes enemy? All jews are a part of g-d!

    Btw this is way off topic

    #1701599
    Mammele
    Participant

    According to my โ€œexpert photo analysisโ€, most likely Rabbi Jacobson doesnโ€™t trim his beard, just tucks it in with โ€œrubber bandsโ€. For some reason itโ€™s very commonly done by Chasidish men, but apparently uncommon in Lubavitch.

    #1701605
    Chossid
    Participant

    โ˜• DaasYochid
    Exactly, he is not interested in finding answers and not interested in crawling out of his hole.

    “If youโ€™re sincere, go ask Rโ€™ Aharon Feldman in person.”
    Sorry you’re just a little over my head.

    #1701608
    Chossid
    Participant

    Syag Lchochma
    It isnโ€™t about hate, it is about watching people do things we know to be wrong.
    I think you see yourself, how many lies were made about chabad, and that’s why I would consider it hate (sometimes).
    Have you ever thought that maybe what you see at first glance may seem wrong, but if you delve in a little bit and learn the subject, it might give you some clarity? ( Like learning a shtikul Gemorah).
    Just look at the statistics, it’s not only Chabad that doesn’t consider them selves ovif havoda zara, it’s also many non Lubavitchers that say the same, litvishe and chassidish, and don’t forget that a big percentage of Chabad weren’t originally lubavitch, meaning they didn’t consider your concerns true.
    So maybe think again and learn more about it, you might change your mind, like your neighbors.
    As yeddin we don’t try to find a fault in someone else.

    #1701620
    EDGARHOOVER
    Participant

    They should change their name to “Jews for Menachem”!!

    #1701798

    Rso – “And rebbetzinwhatโ€™shername, the issue isnโ€™t so much not sleeping in the sukkah as in saying that it is the best way of acting when the Gemoro and ALL poskim (including the Baal Hatanya) say otherwise. The same with eating before Shachris where it is permitted for someone who is feeling weak, and not as a blanket minhag.”

    The pot calling the kettle black. Let me paraphrase your words:

    “the issue isnโ€™t so much about SHAVING or Hoicha Kedusha at MINCHA as in saying that it is the best way of acting when the Gemoro and ALL poskim say otherwise. The same with eating Cholov Akum where it is permitted when needed, and not as a blanket minhag.”

    A bit of a double standard, don’t you think?!

    #1701855

    Double standard? In what way? There is no comparison between the attitudes towards the Halachas you mention.
    Fact check much?

    #1701889
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Rebitzin: RSo is Chassidishe. Cholov akum and shaving deflections are not effective on him. And, not to dignify your comment with too much of a response, but apparently not all poskim agree that heicha mincha is b’deived. Goan brought a proof ealier from the Beis Yosef I think.

    Syag: With the whole “hate” discussion, I agree with you, but to be fair I seem to remember you doing the same thing when we pointed out problems with the Five Towns. And, don’t say it’s not comparable. If anything, those problems were a lot worse than our issues with Chabad. Point is it’s not a Chabad-specific deflection tactic; it just seems to be a human instinct to avoid talking about tough issues within one’s group. I avoid this human character flaw by consistently hating on everyone, including my own people.

    #1701939

    Chosid –
    Have you ever thought that maybe what you see at first glance may seem wrong, but if you delve in a little bit and learn the subject, it might give you some clarity?

    Yes. And I knew little bits of things here and there about Chabad, but the most upsetting and not-okay information I have gotten is from people like you, here, trying to explain things. Over the past couple years I have carefully read and questioned these posters comments and the things you all have said (and that includes things CS said that others told her were wrong as well as TomimTiheye) as well as responses to my own questions and the things you all have taught me have been very disturbing. I have then approached Chabad and non Chabad people in real life regarding these things and I am now more certain that these things are both true and wrong.

    Just look at the statistics, itโ€™s not only Chabad that doesnโ€™t consider them selves ovif havoda zara, itโ€™s also many non Lubavitchers that say the same, litvishe and chassidish, and donโ€™t forget that a big percentage of Chabad werenโ€™t originally lubavitch, meaning they didnโ€™t consider your concerns true.

    sorry, no clue what this means…
    So maybe think again and learn more about it, you might change your mind, like your neighbors.

    Yeah, so I did think and learn and this is where I developed doubts I did not have before. And you (all) cannot keep assuming that if someone does not like or agree with the Chabad ways it is because they are uneducated. That is just plain incorrect.

    As yeddin we donโ€™t try to find a fault in someone else.

    you are correct, we don’t. Which is why it is unfair for you to say that anyone who dislikes Chabad based on their rebbeim’s derecho and teachings is a hater, is uneducated, is speaking lashon hora or motzei shem ra. It’s time for you to become educated and stop finding fault as well. There are many people out there who have very legitimate reasons for either disapproving Chabad or considering it either kefira or a”z. It is BASED ON THE WORDS OF THEIR RABBEIM, POSKIM, GEDOLIM. Are you really advocating that people should go against that? I disagree very very strongly with people who run cash businesses but IF they are doing it with the green light of a Rav (based on his views of government etc) then I have no tayna on those individuals. THAT is what a yid is *supposed* to do.

    #1701880

    Syag – let me explain a bit clearer.

    For shaving a man must rely on kulos that are not universally accepted (and even rejected by Chofetz Chaim and many other poskim).

    For an abridged hoicha kedusha by mincha (doing away with a complete chazoras haShatz), there “might” be obscure opinions that permit it, but it is certainly considered improper by poskim (including the Bais Yossef that mentions it and rejects it as improper).

    But this is considered “the derech” and actually imposed on bochurim in many Litvish yeshivos, not as a b’di’eved, but as the “gold standard” of normative halacha.

    Would anyone claim that these many Litvish yeshivos do not keep halacha? NEVER! It would be an absurd claim!!

    Yet here we are pointing fingers at Chabad that don’t sleep in a sukah.

    Indeed there are opinions that allow sleeping outside the sukah in places that get chilly at night (“mitzta’er”), but Chabad considers this their “derech” , not as a b’di’eved, but as the “gold standard” of normative halacha (just as it is imposed on our bochurim to shave – even against the majority of authorities that prohibit it).

    We also point fingers at Chabad that eat coffee and cake before davening shachris.

    Indeed there are heterim brough in halacha for someone that is weak or wouldn’t be able to daven properly without first having his coffee and cake…but Chabad considers this their “derech” , not as a b’di’eved, but as the “gold standard” of normative halacha (just as it is imposed in our many Litivsh yeshivos to have a short mincha with a hoicha kedusha even against the majority of authorities that prohibit it).

    Here comes the double standard:

    Would anyone claim that these many Litvish yeshivos do not keep halacha? NEVER! It would be an absurd claim!! But we openly claim that Chabad does not keep “proper” halacha! We make this absurd claim and do not see the absurdity and perfidy of our words.

    #1701947

    I knew what you meant, no need to go over it. And I still say there is no comparison between the attitudes.
    If your point, as you claim, is that people should not be putting others down than why the need to be condescending and sarcastic? Is that part of the peace campaign? Is that just a misconception that some have that it is okay to spit at someone as long as they spit first? Oh, I’m so sorry, I mean howl first? If you really had a legit question, and being rude really bothered you, why the need to dish so much of it out?

    #1701965
    LerntminTayrah
    Participant

    All Jews are “part” of Hashem, yes.
    At a very low level, Hashem’s neshama connects us to Him. Human beings are so loft that the malachim wanted to say shira to Adam Harishon. Yes. All true.
    THAT SAID
    We are still nivra and Hashem is still the borei. That is why it’s called elohim acheirim. There are other powers. But Hashem is above them and controls them. Malachim have powers too.
    It is still assur to daven to a human being.
    Hashem Himself has no guf.
    Hashem alone runs the world.
    Hashem is rishon and acharon.
    It violates ikkarim to say Hashem has a form, so the Rebbe’s words of atzmus umahus melubash baguf are kefira.
    It violates ikkarim to say someone other than Hashem runs the world, so saying “The Rebbe helps” is kefira.
    It violates ikkarim to say that you can daven to anyone other than Hashem, so the Rebbe’s use of atzmus to say you can daven directly to a Rebbe are kefira.

    My source is the Rebbe’s own teshuva from 1979. And the gedolim quoted who agree that it’s kefira. As people here seem to not know how to navigate threads, I will repeat them again:
    Rav Aharon Kotler zt”l
    Rav Menachem Mann Shach zt”l
    Rav Menashe Klein zt”l (chassidish posek who clearly understands chassidus and still says yechi is apikorsus)
    yblc”t Rav Aharon Feldman zt”l (if people believe the Rebbe didn’t die and thus deifying him)
    yblc”t Rav Hershel Schachter shlit”a (can be heard on his lecture “segulos and superstitions”, available where his lectures usually are available)

    Prior to 1979, before atzmus, the Rebbe was just another guy who claimed to be moshiach. No big deal, history is full of them, some of them (like Shlomo Molcho) remembered more fondly than others.
    Yerushalayim today is as well Walk around Yerushalayim and you’ll bump into a few claimants for the same crown, all harmless. Atzmus crossed the line. So when Lubavitchers say yechi about a guy who died, saying he’s alive it sounds like deification, with backup from the Rebbe’s own writings to confirm these suspicious. When Lubavitchers say The Rebbe runs the world, it sounds like the tazmus kefira. When Lubavitchers say the items used by the Rebbe have “Elokus” (to quote the words from the “Stump the Rabbi” guy ), it sounds like deification. When The same stump the rabbi guy says the Rebbe can’t make a mistake , even though Moshe Rabbeinu made mistakes, it sounds like deification. When said Stump the Rabbi guy says “everyone believes the Rebbe is alive, just a question of do we tell outsiders”, it kind of confirms suspicions. This goes beyond tzror hachaim that everyone has so please don’t try that red herring. When there are videos of Lubavitchers bowing down to an empty chair that the Rebbe once sat in, that looks like deification. When there are videos of the Chabad LAg Baomer parade where every group performs in front of the Rebbe’s chair as if he’s alive, that looks like deification. When you hear multiple eyewitness stories about people who davened to the Rebbe direcly, it sounds like deification.
    In short, everything Lubavitch in Crown Heights does looks strongly like the kefira put forth by the Rebbe. So yes, stay away.
    It’s easy to accept Lubavitch when you’re an am haaretz looking for a late minyan with vodka, but the more you know, the worse it looks. Yes, chassidus crossed many theological lines that started the slippery slope. Chabad reached rock bottom of the slope with the deification. Just read the ikkarei emuna and judge for yourself.

    Chabad has 2 sets of beliefs- one that they tell outsiders and one that they really believe. Atzmus teshiva is out there now for all to read. So is the basi legani maamar.

    But I’m just a poste balabos. Ask your rabbonim.

    Cut out the middle man- daven to Hashem directly! Have bitachon that Hashem will help as He alone runs the world. Do hiskashrus to Hashem via dveykus to His middos.
    Become of Chossid of Hashem instead of giving money to some grifter “Rebbe”

    #1702017
    Anyusernameopen?
    Participant

    i dont mean that davening to the rebbeor anything similar to that is ok once you understand atzmus

    #1702015
    Anyusernameopen?
    Participant

    great question about atzmus
    from what i understand your whole problem is on the atzmus part – meaning if the atzmus part makes sense everything else in your questions pretty much makes sense and just needs to be fined tuned.

    (as it looks like the moshiach part you can handle especially based on sanhedrin 98B based on poshut pshat and the meforshim there E.G. chasam sofer, pri tzadik, sdei chemed, beis shmuel in shulchan aruch regarding “ksivas get” and others)

    there are a few options either we can try explaining it to you or you can ask a lubavitcher you respect (YY Jacobson was mentioned)

    #1702050
    Sechel HaYashar
    Participant

    “Rav Menashe Klein ztโ€l (chassidish posek who clearly understands chassidus and still says yechi is apikorsus)”

    I read his Tshuva. IIRC he never says that Yechi is Apikursus.
    And if you read the entire Tshuva, you will see the great Kovod he accords the Rebbe, and how he’s distraught over what some are doing to besmirch the Rebbes memory. Rav Klein was very close with the Rebbe, and with Lubavitch. In fact he was one of the Bochnim of the Machon LeHoraa of the Lubavitcher Yeshiva in Morristown NJ until his passing several years ago.

    As for the other names you mentioned, surely you know that for obvious reasons no Lubavitcher will pay too much attention to what they think about us.

Viewing 50 posts - 251 through 300 (of 497 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.