Studies on vaccines you might have missed.👨‍🔬💉🚫

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Controversial Topics Studies on vaccines you might have missed.👨‍🔬💉🚫

Viewing 50 posts - 851 through 900 (of 1,837 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1646043

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    8) The follow-up study concluded that vaccination actually leads to lower mortality.

    For some reason, bais hillel didn’t mention that.

    #1646060

    doomsday
    Participant

    Daas Yochid, which follow up study are you referring to?

    #1646061

    2scents
    Participant

    Keej123,

    Sorry for being late in the discussion.

    Not sure what you are trying to uncover.

    The actual study actually splices the data in all directions, showing no change with MMR vaccine.

    If there are a group of people that have a different variable (such a genetics) which would result in the MMR vaccine together with variable have some sort of synergistic effect and cause the child to develop autism, if that were the case, the group receiving the MMR vaccine would have a higher percentage of cases of autism.

    Since the variable is evenly spread across both groups, if it was the case like you suggested that the variable would cause the MMR shot to cause autism, the group receiving the MMR vaccine would have had a higher percentage of autism cases, as this is the only group that has the variable together with the MMR vaccine.

    Now, this is all assuming that such a variable exists, however, this is just made up hypothetical stuff to satisfy an unsubstantiated agenda that the MMR vaccine plays a roll and is a cause of autism.

    As of now, the data suggests that genetics are what is causing autism.
    PubMed 24794370
    PubMed 21844053

    Parents with children that were diagnosed with Autism are less likely to vaccinate their other children vs other parents, yet the risk of their other children developing autism is significant.

    #1646063

    2scents
    Participant

    “No,

    I’m saying that the ratio of children who are legitimately at risk for regular autism is 1:1,367 vs. the ratio for the risk of MMR autism is 1:108

    We’re trying to calculate risk vs. risk, and therefore must include the full MMR group in order to accurately calculate the risk for regular autism.

    You need to look past getting MMR vs. not getting MMR because the risk extends past that point. or else, you’d be excluding 86,000 children who were really part of that risk.”

    Can you explain what you are referring to?

    What is regular autism vs MMR autism?

    It seems that you are establishing facts, you then take these facts to create an argument.

    #1646064

    2scents
    Participant

    “Total kids at risk is the entire group, not just the No-MMR kids.”

    Explain please, what risk are you referring to, and why is the entire group exposed to this risk.

    #1646080

    keej123
    Participant

    Dellposs

    At the end of 2 years and 2 rounds of immunization with measles, significant reductions were observed in 1–4 year old mortality due to diarrhea and malnutrition in the study area in contrast to control area.

    diahrrea and malnutrition may be an issue in the congo… in 1987…

    #1646109

    keej123
    Participant

    2cents,

    Here are the numbers I calculated according to the study.

    Group A – No Sibling ASD, Yes MMR (5 yrs)

    86,063 children

    792 Autistic (860 × .92)

    1:108 Autism diagnosis ratio

    —-
    Group B – No Sibling ASD, No MMR (5 yrs)

    7,735 children

    68 Autistic (860 × .08)

    1:113 Autism diagnosis ratio

    The rates of Autism are within range for both groups.

    While this shows that the Autism rates for the Non-MMR group are equal, it does nothing to demonstrate the real risk ratio for the non-MMR group. If you’re to say that the autism rate is the same, I need to know what the real Autism rate is for Non-MMR.

    In order to accurately calculate a risk ratio for the non-MMR group i need to calculate:

    Everyone subject to the initial risk ÷ everyone who was diagnosed = risk ratio.

    everyone subject to initial risk = everyone 95,000
    everyone diagnosed = 68 from non-MMR

    Regular non-MMR Autism affects everyone in the group, and therefore must be included when calculating the real ratio.

    The study seems to be working as if the only ones who are subject to regular non-MMR autism are the Non-MMR group. The numbers used in Group B is not reflective of a real risk ratio, rendering them useless to calculate anything.

    dividing non-MMR group by non-MMR autism = a rate not presenting the real risk at all.

    so when taking the real risk ratio into consideration, this study is deceptive

    #1646132

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Doomsday:
    Routine vaccinations and child survival: follow up study in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa
    Ines Kristensen, physician, Peter Aaby, anthropologist, and Henrik Jensen, statistician

    #1646135

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Regular non-MMR Autism

    What is that? Did you make it up?

    What is a risk ratio? What risk are you referring to?

    #1646142

    2scents
    Participant

    “Everyone subject to the initial risk ÷ everyone who was diagnosed = risk ratio.”

    You are avoiding answering the simple question, what initial risk that you keep referring to?

    you are implying that there is an initial risk, which is the basis to you questioning the results.

    Are you referring to the genetic factor. If yes, if there is a factor (or variable) why is that not sufficient to be the cause of autism that you need to blame the MMR vaccine?

    Also, you keep on differentiating between regular autism and MMR autism, what is the difference and what is the source of this difference? Does the study differentiate between the two types of autisms?

    lastly, you claim that regular autism affects everyone (all groups), which would mean that on top of the regular autism, there is the MMR caused autism.

    if that were the case, the MMR group would have a significant increase in autism, as they have the ‘regular autism’ on top of the ‘MMR caused’ autism. While the group without the vaccines would be significantly lower, as they only have the ‘regular autism’.

    The study is only deceptive after you have established your own facts.

    #1646151

    keej123
    Participant

    DaasYochid/2cents,

    Something is causing Autism – I don’t know what. THAT is a risk for everyone. I labeled it “Regular Autism”. What would you like to call it?

    #1646191

    2scents
    Participant

    Bais Hillel

    “If I missed anything, you are more than welcome to add to the collection.”

    yup, you missed the entire point of the study.

    If you check out the Bandim Health project, which Dr Peter Aaby undertook in 1978 you would actually understand that he and the project actually observed that vaccines actually played a significant role in reducing mortality.

    It was the groups opinion that the DTP vaccine actually had negative effects and increased mortality vs those that got the OPV vaccine.

    However, the study has some issues, first off this was the groups bias, second the very small group that it studied.

    It had 18 deaths. with some that were documented as sudden or no information, with a small cohort every single death in a group pushes the results in one direction.

    The WHO addresses this and many other studies on the DTP vaccine, it categorizes the studies by high risk of bias vs very high risk of bias.

    #1646216

    2scents
    Participant

    “Something is causing Autism – I don’t know what. THAT is a risk for everyone. I labeled it “Regular Autism”. What would you like to call it?”

    Bad genes.

    #1646219

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Something is causing Autism – I don’t know what. THAT is a risk for everyone. I labeled it “Regular Autism”. What would you like to call it?

    Autism. Whether the subject had an MMR vaccine or not.

    By labeling some as “regular autism” and some as “MMR autism” you are making an assumption that there’s either a difference in the condition in MMR vaccinated subjects and those without MMR, or that MMR is a cause. Neither are proven, and that’s precisely what the study is trying to determine.

    #1646241

    keej123
    Participant

    2cents,

    In short, why are the no-MMR group and Yes-MMR group producing Autism at an equal rate?

    Because: while the rate of the yes-MMR group was calculated based on something that would reflect the factor that may have caused their Autism… which is getting the MMR, – which shows what the MMR could be causing inside that group…

    The rate of the no-MMR group is based on a random criteria of not getting MMR, which doesn’t reflect how strong or weak their cause of Autism is operating.

    So who cares?

    Because you can’t claim that their Autism is operating at the same rate, unless you take their cause into consideration. If their cause is genetics, so at what rate is genetics operating in comparison to what MMR would be operating. So in essence, their cause IS operating at a much lower rate than MMR group. It just that this number was never calculated.

    #1646248

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    In short, why are the no-MMR group and Yes-MMR group producing Autism at an equal rate?

    Because MMR doesn’t cause autism.

    #1646272

    Dellposs
    Participant

    Peter Aaby and the others clearly support measles vaccination:

    “In the years following the introduction of measles vaccination, mortality for children aged 6 to 35 months has significantly diminished. Though this is not a controlled study of vaccinated and unvaccinated children, much of the reduced mortality can apparently be attributed to the protective effect of measles vaccination.”

    Measles vaccination and reduction in child mortality: A community study from Guinea-Bissau

    #1646278

    Meno
    Participant

    I would like to take a survey:

    Is there anyone here who understands what keej is trying to say?

    Just answer yes or no and we’ll take it from there.

    #1646289

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Yes

    #1646292

    2scents
    Participant

    keej123

    “Because you can’t claim that their Autism is operating at the same rate, unless you take their cause into consideration. If their cause is genetics, so at what rate is genetics operating in comparison to what MMR would be operating. ”

    Once again, the argument or concern you raise is only after you establish that the MMR actually operates, the study proves that the MMR has zero effect on autism rates, which is why there is no difference between the group that got the MMR shot and the ones that have not.

    To simplify it, lets say the cause of autism is genetics (which the data clearly points in that direction, as noted in my previous post), that would explain why the rate of autism is not dependant on any other factors.

    I think that you have a misconception and believe that the MMR vaccine plays a factor and the only question is how much of a factor, that would be the only explanation for your questions. Yet the study proves that the MMR vaccine plays no factor and is in line with the many other studies that all show the same.

    #1646293

    doomsday
    Participant

    Daas Yochid: n short, why are the no-MMR group and Yes-MMR group producing Autism at an equal rate?
    Because MMR doesn’t cause autism.

    No. Because of Healthy User Bias. The MMR Study itself admits that children who are healthy and normal are more likely to get fully vaccinated while children who show signs of Autism/Delays are more likely Not to get MMR. But these Non-MMR children got 23 other vaccines, starting with Hepatitis B on day of Birth and Vitamin K shot at birth (contains aluminum). The Healthy User Bias HIDES the MMR-Autism connection.
    In a real Scientific Study it is RANDOMIZED which subjects get MMR and which do not. When parents select which children do not get MMR, it is the children who are showing signs of Autism who do not get MMR which invalidates the whole study!

    #1646294

    2scents
    Participant

    keej123

    “The rate of the no-MMR group is based on a random criteria of not getting MMR,”

    Exactly, which is the point of the conspiracy and study.

    #1646299

    doomsday
    Participant

    In third world countries, vaccinated = lower mortality but NOT because of the vaccines. It is because children who have access to health care in Third World Countries have: 1. Higher Income Families 2. Better Food 3. Cleaner Water 4. Better Educated Parents.

    Folks, WHY are these vaccine studies usually done in FOREIGN Countries and NOT USA – even when Funded by CDC or US Companies?
    Because CDC and Vaccine Industry purposely selects countries that have very low autism rates (like Denmark) or Third World Countries where the unvaccinated children have a higher mortality rate due to malnutrition, dirty water, over-crowding etc.

    #1646302

    Doomsday, you have been asked not to post in bold.

    If you do it again, your posts will be deleted.

    #1646304

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    In a real Scientific Study it is RANDOMIZED which subjects get MMR and which do not. When parents select which children do not get MMR, it is the children who are showing signs of Autism who do not get MMR

    As mentioned numerous times, you can’t choose random children to not vaccinate. It’s unethical.

    You can’t have it both ways. You demand retrospective studies, then complain about the inherent flaws in a retrospective study.

    These are scientific studies made by professionals. I’m sure they control for these biases as best as possible, and, for example, exclude autistic children who didn’t get vaccinated because there were already signs of autism before they were to receive their immunization.

    #1646308

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    The rate of the no-MMR group is based on a random criteria of not getting MMR

    According to you it’s not random, because not getting MMR should have a lower autism rate.

    #1646312

    Meno
    Participant

    Folks, WHY are these vaccine studies usually done in FOREIGN Countries and NOT USA

    Probably because there aren’t enough anti-vaxxers in the US who are willing to be part of such a study.

    #1646321

    doomsday
    Participant

    DaasYochid: I’m sure they control for these biases as best as possible, and, for example, exclude autistic children who didn’t get vaccinated because there were already signs of autism before they were to receive their immunization.

    Wrong! The authors of the MMR-Autism study wrote that children who are showing signs of study are more likely to not get the MMR shot – but they were not excluded from the study.
    And according to the editors of the most prestigious medical journals (New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet) most studies are FAKE. Studies are designed to “prove” whatever the one paying for the study
    wants the study to “prove”.

    #1646322

    doomsday
    Participant

    Meno: Folks, WHY are these vaccine studies usually done in FOREIGN Countries and NOT USA

    Probably because there aren’t enough anti-vaxxers in the US who are willing to be part of such a study.

    Wrong. They either pick countries with very low autism rates (like Denmark) or Third World Countries where unvaxxed babies are like to be suffering from malnutrition, dirty water, no sanitation, overcrowding and thus have a higher mortality rate then the vaxxed babies.

    #1646363

    2scents
    Participant

    Dooms,

    You dont get to decide what is right and what is wrong, also you dont get to make up facts.

    I feel sorry that you have an anti medicine and anti scientific view to sell, the rest of us will continue to focus on the evidence at hand and make evidence based decisions.

    #1646466

    Meno
    Participant

    Doomsday,
    Wrong. They either pick countries with very low autism rates (like Denmark) or Third World Countries where unvaxxed babies are like to be suffering from malnutrition, dirty water, no sanitation, overcrowding and thus have a higher mortality rate then the vaxxed babies.

    Wrong. Whenever they start doing a study in the US, all the scientists involved mysteriously get eaten by hyenas.

    (See? I can make up garbage too.)

    #1646478

    Some Common Sense
    Participant

    2cents (#1646363)
    It appears you point is correct. There are anti-vaxxers that are
    1) Anti-establishment
    2) Anti-science
    3) Anti-medicine
    4) Anti-personal physicians
    5) Unwilling to follow the far majority of Da’as Torah
    6) Are placing their personal views above Halachah

    What do we call this? Please answer this question.

    You must try the pears. I think it may help this discussion, but wait, there are bacteria and pesticides that we need to worry about on them. Oh well, healthy pears, after washing with soap and water, are worth the minor risk of trace amounts of bacteria and pesticides for my overall healthy, right?

    #1646535

    kavod Habriot
    Participant

    Ignored are the hundreds of רבן בית של תינוקות who were summarily expelled from yeshivos
    with no arrangements made to guarantee their chinuch.
    Ignored are the hundreds of abused children who crying because they are made to feel like
    they did something wrong when in fact their parents have made the decision that these children
    cannot tolerate vaccines.
    Ignored are the dozens of cases of serious shalom bayis issues where one spouse has seen
    vaccine damage in some of their children, whilst the other spouse cannot bear to see the children
    home, day after day.
    Ignored are the cries from Jewish mothers who each have a horror story to relate as to why
    they cannot vaccinate their children, yet they are being denied basic human rights that even children
    who act most inappropriately are not treated that way.
    Ignored are the feuds when relatives disinvite friends and family to simchos because they are
    “untouchables”.
    Ignored are kimpatorins who have many children home because they were hounded from
    school and no siblings can offer to watch these “contaminated” children. Ignored are parents who
    have left their jobs because they must now stay home to babysit their children.
    Ignored is all civility.
    Ignored is basic mentchlechkait.
    All because “We believe in universal vaccination”.
    Ignored.

    #1646542

    Meno
    Participant

    Ignored.

    You can’t be selfish and then complain that no one comes to your aid when your selfishness comes back to bite you.

    #1646547

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Ignored are the hundreds of רבן בית של תינוקות who were summarily expelled from yeshivos
    with no arrangements made to guarantee their chinuch.
    Ignored are the hundreds of abused children who crying because they are made to feel like
    they did something wrong when in fact their parents have made the decision that these children
    cannot tolerate vaccines.
    Ignored are the dozens of cases of serious shalom bayis issues where one spouse has seen
    vaccine damage in some of their children, whilst the other spouse cannot bear to see the children
    home, day after day.
    Ignored are the cries from Jewish mothers who each have a horror story to relate as to why
    they cannot vaccinate their children, yet they are being denied basic human rights that even children
    who act most inappropriately are not treated that way.
    Ignored are the feuds when relatives disinvite friends and family to simchos because they are
    “untouchables”.
    Ignored are kimpatorins who have many children home because they were hounded from
    school and no siblings can offer to watch these “contaminated” children. Ignored are parents who
    have left their jobs because they must now stay home to babysit their children.
    Ignored is all civility.
    Ignored is basic mentchlechkait.
    All because “We believe in universal vaccination”.
    Ignored.

    The fault lays squarely at the feet of the stubborn parents who refuse to vaccinate their children.

    #1646551

    kavod Habriot
    Participant

    The fault lays squarely at the feet of the stubborn people who refuse to mind their own buisness. Do some research & you will find out why some of us have very valid concerns why we feel vaccinations is not safe for our loved ones.

    Please use quotation marks or italics when quoting other posts.

    Thank you – Moderator 25

    #1646554

    kavod Habriot
    Participant

    Vaccinations are unsafe. It will be considered one one of the biggest scams in US history.
    Be very careful before anyone tries to bully or manipulate you into medicating your child. It states on the FDA website “vaccination is medication”. Why are we medicating our healthy children? Do some research & open up your minds….

    #1646558

    doomsday
    Participant

    ProVaxxers, Let me explain Keej’s point:

    When I point out all the babies who die of SIDS following DPT Vaccination, you ProVaxxers claim,
    “ALL Babies have risk of SIDS. Those Babies would have gotten SIDS even without the DPT Vaccine”

    Keej is saying the same thing. ALL Children have a Risk of Autism. Most of the Autistic children in the MMR group would have gotten Autism even without the MMR. But MMR DID INCREASE the Risk of Autism!

    In Group B (No ASD Sibling, NO MMR) the Autism rate was 1:113.

    Group A (No ASD Sibling, YES MMR) has 86,063 children.
    1:113 of THESE children would have gotten Autism even WITHOUT MMR!
    86,063 divided by 113 = 761 children who would have gotten Autism anyway.
    But group B had 792 children with Autism, therefore MMR INCREASED risk of autism.
    792 – 761 = 31. 86,063 divided by 31 = 1:2,776.
    So MMR INCREASES risk of Autism 1:2,776

    But really the MMR Risk is Higher because this was NOT a RANDOMIZED study. Children who are Normal and Healthy more likely to get MMR and children who are showing SIGNS OF AUTISM are less likely to get
    MMR. So Parents selecting who does not get MMR, HIDES the real risk of MMR.

    Furthermore, Autism rate of 1:113 is for VACCINATED Children without MMR.
    Autism rate for UNVACCINATED Children is around 1:3,333.
    So Vaccines cause Autism!

    #1646559

    Meno
    Participant

    It states on the FDA website “vaccination is medication”. Why are we medicating our healthy children?

    So that they don’t get sick.

    Is that seriously the best you can come up with?

    #1646566

    doomsday
    Participant

    2cents: “Something is causing Autism – I don’t know what. THAT is a risk for everyone. I labeled it “Regular Autism”. What would you like to call it?”

    Bad genes.

    NO! Vaccines are causing Autism.
    Autism Rate of Vaccinated Chidlren 1:50
    Autism Rate of UNVACCINATED Children 1:3,333

    #1646569

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    You made those numbers up.

    #1646570

    Meno
    Participant

    Hey doomsday, here’s a question:

    If you’re explaining what keej is saying, how did you come up with different numbers than keej?

    #1646576

    doomsday
    Participant

    Meno: Why are we medicating our healthy children? So that they don’t get sick.

    Since CDC TRIPLED the Vaccine Schedule around 1990 we have the SICKEST Children in USA History!!!
    1:6 children are learning disabled
    1:6 children are allergic
    1:13 children have asthma
    1:15 children have ADHD
    1:5 teens had episode of mental illness
    1:8 children have IBS
    1:50 children have autism
    1:100 children have epilepsy
    1:250 children have tourettes syndrome
    1:400 children have diabetes
    1:775 babies die of SIDS
    1:1,000 children have Celiac Disease
    1:5,560 children have CANCER
    168 Deaths following vaccines reported to VAERS every year. (only 1-13% of serious adverse events reported)
    ZERO deaths from Measles (in USA).

    THIS is why CDC refuses to do a Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed RETROSPECTIVE Study!
    Because it will PROVE that Vaccines cause Autism, ADHD, Learning Disabilities, Allergies, Epilepsy, Asthma, etc.

    ProVaxxers, Explain why CDC refuses to do a Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed RETROSPECTIVE Study???

    #1646585

    Meno
    Participant

    If I were an anti-vaxxer, I would be telling doomsday to stop talking. He’s just making you guys look bad.

    #1646590

    doomsday
    Participant

    Doomsday,
    Wrong. They either pick countries with very low autism rates (like Denmark) or Third World Countries where unvaxxed babies are like to be suffering from malnutrition, dirty water, no sanitation, overcrowding and thus have a higher mortality rate then the vaxxed babies.

    Wrong. Whenever they start doing a study in the US, all the scientists involved mysteriously get eaten by hyenas.

    (See? I can make up garbage too.)

    Yes, MENO makes up garbage (LIES) but I report the Facts. Here is my Proof:
    Children who are vaccinated in third world countries have better educated parents, higher income, better food, cleaner water, less overcrowding, more access to medical care then Unvaccinated Children. THAT is the reason for lower mortality of Vaccinated Children in THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES – NOT the Vaccines.
    Proof: BBC.COM “In developing countries, research shows a strong link between the education of mothers and immunisation of children against preventable diseases such as polio, diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, measles and tuberculosis.
    In Third World Countries, the only girls (Mothers) who are educated are from families with HIGHER Incomes which means Better Food, Cleaner Water, Less Overcrowding and Access to Medical Care – and THAT is why Vaccinated Children in Third World Countries have LOWER Mortality – NOT because of Vaccines!

    Denmark has low autism rate: Proof: Focus for Health.Org “Autism Rates across Developed World”
    Denmark: 1:149 which is 1/3 of the US rate of 1:50

    Proof that Meno makes up Garbage/Lies but I report substantiated FACTS!

    #1646628

    ubiquitin
    Participant

    “Ignored…”

    You HAVE GOT to be kidding!

    This thread is 18 pages long now.
    We aren’t ignoring any of those things.
    It is terrible what you are doing to your children, that’s why we are here, we are NOT ignoring them.
    You (not individually I mean “you” as in the collective anti-vax group) are ignoring truth, ignoring (many) questions posed, ignoring answers
    and as a result neglecting your children.
    Don’t blame that on us.

    #1646634

    doomsday
    Participant

    Doomsday: 1:50 Vaccinated Children get autism vs 1:3,333 UNVACCINATED Children.
    Proof that VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM
    Daas Yochid: You made those numbers up.

    NO, I did NOT make up those numbers.
    In 1970, only 1 child in 10,000 was diagnosed with autism. Psychology Today (a PROvax Magazine)
    In 1970 only children with NON-VERBAL Autism were diagnosed as “Autistic”.
    Today only 1/3 of Autistic Children are NON-VERBAL. (Source: Autism Speaks – PROVax Organization)
    So the DSM ‘TRIPLED” the rate of Autism by Expanding the definition of Autism.
    So, per TODAY’S Definition, the rate of Autism in 1970 was 1:3,333.

    In the 1960s Children received only FOUR Vaccines: Smallpox, DPT, Polio and Measles and their
    Autism Rate by TODAY’S Definition was 1:3,333
    Today’s Children receive FOUR TIMES as many Vaccines as the 1960s and the Autism Rate is 1:50 !!!

    There have been a few vaxxed vs unvaxxed studies and they show that Autism Rate isi MUCH higher in the
    Vaxxed population! That is why CDC refuses to do Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed study, despite being asked to do so.

    Proof that VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM!

    #1646641

    doomsday
    Participant

    Meno: If I were an anti-vaxxer, I would be telling doomsday to stop talking. He’s just making you guys look bad.

    Translation: I wish Doomsday would stop posting. She is making ProVaxxers look bad 😉

    Anti-Vaxxers have praised my posts, Meno, so you are WRONG on that as well!

    #1646648

    Some Common Sense
    Participant

    Doomsday,
    you stated “Here is my Proof: Children who are vaccinated in third world countries have better educated parents, higher income, better food, cleaner water, less overcrowding, more access to medical care then Unvaccinated Children. ”

    I do not what world you are on but the United States have some of strictest environmental laws and regulations in the world and some of the best health care; please see how many people from other countries fly to the USA for medical care. Income, please look on line for the USA standard of living versus “developing counties” like Brazil

    #1646655

    doomsday
    Participant

    There is NO reason to ban Unvaccinated Children to school when schools allow:

    1. Recently Vaccinated Children whom Vaccine Inserts and Hospitals used to Bar from Immuno-Compromised because Recently Vaccinated Children CAN SPREAD DISEASE. (After this hypocrisy was pointed out, they changed the Vaccine Inserts and Hospital Guides, but this was not based on any studies – just a cover-up).

    2. Adults are allowed in Schools without having to prove they are Immune to Diseases – even though their immunity probably wore off.

    3. 3% of the Vaccinated Children are NOT immune because the vaccines did not work on them But they
    are allowed in school.

    The ONLY reason Unvaxxed are Barred from schools is to FORCE them to Vaccinate – NOT because they
    present any real risk to others!

    The CDC refuses to do a Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed Study. The CDC and Pharmaceutical Companies want to
    ELIMINATE ALL UNVAXXED in order to Destroy the “SMOKING GUN” Proof that Vaccines cause Autism!
    It’s as if the Government FORCED everyone to Smoke Cigarettes in order to COVER UP that Smoking Causes
    Cancer by Eliminating All Non-Smokers!

Viewing 50 posts - 851 through 900 (of 1,837 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


Trending