WATCH: Iran: “Queen Elizabeth Is Like Hitler, One Of The Greatest Criminals”


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Iran’s Channel 1 aired a special report last week on the death of Queen Elizabeth.

But unlike other countries, where reports focused on the Queen’s life, her charity work and the intense mourning of the British public, the Islamic Republic had a different take on the demise of the Queen, which the host said is “good news for the world’s oppressed people.”

“After 70 years on the throne, this queen has left a grade sheet full of crime, abomination, and filth,” he added.

The host’s guest, a professor at Tehran University, added his comments, saying that “the Queen of England is one of the greatest criminals in the history of mankind.”

“Perhaps, in light of her 70 years on the throne, she should be included on the same list as Hitler,” he continued. “From a certain perspective, we should be sad that this person died, because she died without standing trial, without being punished, and without paying for her crimes.”

Apparently, liberal leftists in the US have a lot in common with Iran as they have a similar view of Queen Elizabeth, as Tucker Carlson reported on Fox News:

(YWN Israel Desk – Jerusalem)


  1. I thought either they love Hitler Ym”s because he slaughtered the evil Jews or the Holocaust never happened and the Jews made the whole thing up?? Can’t have it both ways and compare QEII to him!!

  2. Her barbaric and cold-blooded white paper legacy murdered countless Jewish men, women and children -holocaust survivors, while arming and appeasing Arab terrorists. Ywn needs to learn Jewish history and stop trying to revise it!

  3. Interestingly Hitler ym”s called the Queen’s mother the most dangerous woman in Europe, because her steadfast determination to resist the German bombardment of British cities inspired many Brits to persist in their resistance against the German attacks. On the other hand, the Iranians do have some legitimate grievances against the British and Americans, who engineered a coup against the popular prime minister Mosaddegh in 53 for having the audacity of taking oil wells away from British oil companies and use their profits for the benefit of his people, and replacing him with the brutal and widely hated Shah who used widespread torture to keep his regime in place.

  4. Shlomomo, you are just displaying your ignorance. Not only was she not responsible in any way for the White Paper — she was just a girl at the time — but neither was her father. It was a decision of the democratically elected government of the UK, not of the King. The King has no role in making government policy, and cannot even comment on it in public. He must accept whatever policies his government adopts, until there is a new government with new policies, whereupon he must accept those.

  5. Por, that is a false accusation. Mossadegh was the coup. The US and UK helped sway public opinion to support the Shah’s return. Mossadegh had no right to oust the Shah in the first place, and he also had no right to steal the oil companies’ property. Unfortunately Eisenhower supported that wicked policy and made the Shah implement it; it was nothing but theft. The oil did not belong to the Iranian people, and they had no right to have it used for their benefit. They did not create it, they did not discover it, so by what right was it theirs? Minerals lying undiscovered in the ground are worth nothing; they naturally belong to those who create their value, by exploring for them and extracting them.