Fury Over Chief of Staff’s Letter: “He’s Welcome to Join a Left-Wing Party”

MK Boaz Bismuth (seen on right) slammed IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, accusing him of using his position to play politics.

Israeli coalition members expressed fury over IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir’s letter on Monday expressing his opposition to the law freezing the arrests of bnei yeshivos, accusing him of political motives, especially in light of the letter’s timing.

Likud MK Boaz Bismuth, the chairman of the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs Committee, issued an unusually strong statement against Zamir in response to his letter, accusing the IDF Chief of Staff of “calculated political timing” and noting that the IDF had failed to present “even a single case” in which the arrest of a Chareidi individual resulted in enlistment.

“The question must be asked why the letter was sent only after the committee had completed its discussions and voting, and why it was published davka on the day the bill was due to reach the plenum,” Bismuth wrote. “If the goal had been to improve the bill’s wording, the IDF had approximately three weeks to do so. It is difficult to view this timing as a coincidence.”

Bismuth added that the final version of the bill was formulated in full coordination with Defense Ministry representatives and in accordance with their explicit requests. The committee also made the unusual decision to allow the Defense Ministry to submit two reservations after the legal deadline had passed. Both reservations were accepted in full and incorporated into the final text.

Responding to Zamir’s claim that the legislation would divert critical military attention and resources during wartime, Bismuth wrote: “It is precisely the arrests that do not lead to enlistment and fail to achieve their intended purpose that divert the attention and resources of the security forces for no benefit.”

A senior security official called the letter a “political move at the lowest level.” Speaking to Channel 14 News, the official said that the bill had been under discussion in the Knesset committee for approximately three weeks, during which the IDF representative attending the hearings “did not say a word.” Zamir sent the letter and leaked it to the media only after the committee completed its deliberations and approved the bill.

“The letter is a disgrace and an improper intervention in the legislative process,” the official said. “If we weren’t on the eve of elections, this could very well have led to another deep rift between the political and military leadership.”

Likud MK Chanoch Milwidsky, chairman of the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, excoriated the IDF Chief of Staff in an interview with Galey Yisrael on Tuesday morning. “Zamir lost his way a long time ago,” he said. “His conduct toward the legislative branch is outrageous. I only wish he showed the same determination when dealing with our enemies.”

Likud MM Tally Gotliv called for Zamir’s dismissal, writing: “Zamir, I suggest you know your place! Know your place! I’m not threatening you, of course, because I have no authority to do so. But your disgraceful letter yesterday warrants your dismissal. You crossed into the political arena and, in doing so, weakened the morale of our soldiers and the citizens of Israel, sounding no different than an opposition MK. If it were up to me, I would dismiss you without hesitation—the sooner, the better.”

Shas MK Yossi Taieb also slammed Zamir in an interview with Kol Chai on Tuesday morning, accusing the IDF Chief of Staff of “siding with the opposition.”

“I’m sorry to say this, but the Chief of Staff apparently hasn’t been listening to the dramatic testimony presented before the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee,” Taieb said. “His letter reflects a complete disconnect from what is happening on the ground.”

“Every leading professional involved in Chareidi enlistment—including Yossi Levy, CEO of the Netzah Yehuda organization, along with other senior figures—appeared before the committee and repeatedly made it clear that the current wave of aggressive arrests is harming the IDF and severely damaging efforts to enlist Chareidim.”

“These arrests have the opposite effect. They discourage even those Chareidim who enlisted in frameworks such as the Chashmonaim Brigade, designated Chareidi yeshiva programs, or Netzach Yehuda. When a bochur man sees his brother or a friend from his neighborhood being arrested, he says, ‘I don’t want to join an army like that.’ To claim that ending the arrests would hurt enlistment is simply disconnected from reality.”

“The Chief of Staff has unfortunately chosen to side with the opposition. If he wants to influence policy from within the Knesset, he’s welcome to take off his uniform, run with one of the left-wing parties, and find his place there. That letter had no place.”

(YWN Israel Desk—Jerusalem)

5 Responses

  1. Bibi has a “great” track record in picking winners as leaders
    The brainwashed folks keep voting Likud

  2. The chief of staff should be doing his job, not engaging in politics. He was appointed to follow the orders of the government. His personal opinion was not requested and has no bearing.

  3. While the arrests don’t result in Chareidim enlisting, they do have a calculated political effect.
    They incite the electorate to support left-wing politicians and parties.

  4. What’s his problem the bill is full of fine print that basically lets them police yeshivos like it’s back in the days of Poland. They’ll use any excuse to shut a place down

  5. It looks like chief of staff agrees with rochei yeshivos, they both don’t want army to sit and watch how well bochrim are shtaiging. Also, a system of random inspections just invites those who are weak and are not yashar enough to risk it and hope to beat the system, maybe having misguided hopr for help min hashamayim.

    There should be a better way to ensure integrity of the systtem: non-random measurements, such as biometrics/cameras/timecards; rabbinical supervision by someone who is trusted both by rabbonim and yeshivos. Maybe multiple zabla mobile batei din – a yeshiva rav, an army rav, and they select the third?

    But the good part, if this is an imperfect compromise, it can be fixed in the next iteration. It is better than previous lack of agreement.

Leave a Reply

Popular Posts