For PAA and Randomex to Jokingly Argue about Reading All CR Threads and Post (or something like that

Home Forums Rants For PAA and Randomex to Jokingly Argue about Reading All CR Threads and Post (or something like that

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #613742

    SayIDidIt™
    Participant

    Have fun!

    Don’t forget to read between the lines!

    And if you have any REAL jokes, feel free to visit the Jokes thread again. Until then, keep your “amusing” arguments here.

    Thanks!

    #1038596

    Love it!

    #1038597

    SayIDidIt™
    Participant

    #1038598

    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    How is this thread title possible? According to my calculations, the character limit should have been reached after the word “or”.

    I’m stumped. -100

    #1038599

    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    How about we seriously argue about the propriety of having an argument in the Jokes thread about “reading all threads”, or more encompassingly, the propriety of having a tangential discussion in a thread. I agree that one should not just start talking about something else in the middle of a thread. But if something is brought up in such a way as to relate to the discussion at hand, then I see nothing wrong with that spawning its own discussion. Often times the tangent ends up becoming the ikkar – see for example http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/not-losing-daas-torah#post-535895

    If the original discussion is still ongoing in full force, and the new discussion is also a big discussion, then I could hear that it should be moved to another thread. But in absence of that, I don’t think there is such an issue, especially in a thread such as the Jokes thread where each post is really self-contained so it doesn’t detract anything if there is another conversation going on (as opposed to in a thread which itself is one conversation where a second conversation can detract).

    #1038600

    SayIDidIt™
    Participant

    PAA, in a way you are right, however, the point of the Jokes thread (IMNSHO) is for someone looking for humor to get a laugh. When a (really not funny – even between the lines) discussion is stuck in middle of it, it ruins the whole point of the thread.

    #1038601

    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “really not funny – even between the lines”

    Sorry, I can’t help it if you don’t get the joke.

    #1038602

    sm29
    Participant

    i agree that we should keep the joke thread for pure jokes.

    #1038603

    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    The Jokes thread is not a discussion.

    #1038604

    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    Did anyone insinuate that it is?

    #1038605

    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant
    #1038606

    Randomex
    Member

    Yes. I’m working on a response.

    It really can be annoying not having any way

    to get another person’s attention, eh?

    Just yesterday I saw for the first time

    responses written to me nearly a week ago,

    and someone responded to a post of mine after

    more than a month. There’s no way to know if

    someone’s ignoring you or simply unaware –

    we all have plausible deniability. 🙂

    #1038607

    cozimjewish
    Member

    Randomex – right. Like:

    “Randomex would you please enlighten me as to how that was apikorsus….”

    (Me, on the things kids did/said thread)

    “Randomex, are you male or female?”

    (Showjoe, on the mistaken lyrics thread)

    ……..

    (I have a strong suspicion that the ones I just mentioned were ignored rather than not seen ;P)

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.