“Why do you see new laws as a possible threat to freedom?”
Generally, by definition, a law restricts one from doing something, meaning you are no longer free to do that thing. Seems pretty pashut.
“This is the actually the first time I�ve seen anyone argue in favor of the supreme court with an argument that borders on anarchy.”
Doesn’t seem like it should be such a stretch. The whole point of judicial branch is the curb government overreach. It seems like it was only a few years back when that was considered a conservative ideal. Now I guess anyone who isn’t pro-authoritarian is an anarchist.
“They strike down a law based on a �reasonableness� standard.”
That’s pretty stupid; they should have a constitution. Is that what these reforms would seek to do?