Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Continuation of Discussion on R' Slifkin and Weiss from Manchester Eiruv Thread › Reply To: Continuation of Discussion on R' Slifkin and Weiss from Manchester Eiruv Thread
ROB
So far the only specific thing Sam2 has said about rabbi Meiselmann’s book is that he does not address the “main” gemorah used by Slifkin.
That seems to be an oversight on his part as I pointed out the three different places where it is in fact discussed and in great detail.
Regarding the Rambam,
There is no way in the world that the Rambam mean’s what you say. I have no idea how you even came out with that (The Rambam is talking about Pesukim!?).
And the Rambam is pretty famous and discussed ( I think I pointed out the Shelah) it’s also brought down by Eidensohn in his Daat Torah book in English.
If I have time later I’ll post a basic word for word translation of the second and third groups.