Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Continuation of Discussion on R' Slifkin and Weiss from Manchester Eiruv Thread › Reply To: Continuation of Discussion on R' Slifkin and Weiss from Manchester Eiruv Thread
“(An Ex. is Slifkin using RSRH letter on Aggadita to justify stating Chazal only knew the science of their times and then turning around and stating because of that we shoud adopt MN when RSRH himself wrote one of the most forceful condemnations of MN ever put in print by an Achron in a letter that was directed at Reform Jews!)”
So what would you call using RSRH condemnation of MN to justify that Chazal were scientifically omniscient when RSRH wrote a letter on Aggadita that is possibly the most blunt statement of Chazal’s lack of scientific omniscience ever put in print?