Reply To: Continuation of Discussion on R' Slifkin and Weiss from Manchester Eiruv Thread

Home Forums Controversial Topics Continuation of Discussion on R' Slifkin and Weiss from Manchester Eiruv Thread Reply To: Continuation of Discussion on R' Slifkin and Weiss from Manchester Eiruv Thread

#1001980
Patur Aval Assur
Participant

Daas Yochid:

You say that this compromise is absolute nonsense, yet I just quoted R’ Dessler and the Dor Revii who posited such a compromise. I didn’t include that part of the text of the Dor Revii before so here it is now:

?????? ????????, ??? ??? ????? ???? ??????”? ???? ??? ??????, ?????? ????? ?? ???? ????, ????? ???? ?? ???? ????, ?????? ?????? ?????? ????, ??? ????? ???? ????? ????? ??????? ??????, ?? ???? ????, ??? ??? ???? ????? ????? ???? ????? ????? ???, ??? ??? ???? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ???, ??? ??? ??? ?? ??????? ???????? ?? ?????? ??? ?????, ????”? ?????? ????? ??? ????? ???? ??? ????? ???, ?????? ????? ?? ?????, ????’ ??? ????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ?????, ??? ??? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ????? ????? ?? ?????, ??? ????? ?”? ?????? ?”? ?”? ??? ?????? ?? ?????? ??, ??? ?? ??? ?? ???? ?????, ??”? ????”? ??”? ???’ ????? ??’ ?”? ??”? “???? ??? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ???, ??? ????? ????? ??? ???? ??? ???? ???? ????? ?????? ????????, ??????? ????? ???? ???? ?????, ???? ????’, ?????? ???? ??? ???? ?????? ???? ???? ?????, ??? ??? ???? ????? ??? ????, ??”? ????? ????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ????’ ???, ??? ?? ??? ?? ???? ????? ????? ?”? ????? ??? ?????” ??”? ????

???? ?? ??? ???? ?? ??? ??? ???? ????? ??????? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ?????? ????, ??? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ???? ?? ????? ??????”? ???? ??????, ??? ??? ???? ????? ?? ????? ?? ??”? ??????? ??????? ?? ?? ????? ?????? ???????, ??? ?? ????? ????? ????, ?? ?? ????? ???? ??? ???, ???? ???? ???? ????”? ????”? ?????? ????? ??”?

Also note that the Dor Revii is saying that this was the Rambam’s view.

You further claim that he misreads his sources. So please provide alternate readings for the sources that I quoted.