It doesn’t prove graphology. What it does is demonstrate that there is not much scientific research/data that supports it. To use the inverse of your favorite line on you, “something can be wrong even if I can’t prove it”. The point is that if something doesn’t have sufficient evidence supporting it then we should be skeptical (all the more so if it has evidence against it). I can claim that I can tell about you from looking at techeiles. There is no evidence supporting my claim but you haven’t disproven it. And even if you would demonstrate that all my predictions are wrong, I could just say that it just proves that I am a charlatan but not that you can’t tell about a person from looking at techeiles.
Menu