Home › Forums › Health & Fitness › No police protection for a week › Reply To: No police protection for a week
Health
I dont know fake halacha so well, but I’ll bite. Why was he a treifa?
You also didnt respond to my question to you. here it is again:
“If it tuns out that Officers Ramos and Liu have ever stolen anything in their lives (even a shava perutah or less), ever been mevarech Hashem, gilui Arayos etc, then it is “very good” that they got shot!?”
Nequeitam
– “The Jury decided that there was no case to answer” I beleive the jury was wrong. And this isnt the first time
-“the Jury’s verdict is doubtless better informed that mine or yours'” Doubtless? A jury of 12 people too dumb to get out of jury duty is now doubtless? You are aware that in choosing a jury lawyers avoid educated people as thye prefer people they can manipulate.
also you have quite a few “probably”s in your post.
-“but you appear unclear as to the process, and freely say that you have no idea how the law can be improved.”
I have lots of ideas bu we are already of topic, if something is worng I dont think you have to offer a better solution inorder to be allowed to protest.
-“don’t actually seem to know why”
Weve been going at this for quite a few posts, you can disagree with me obviously, but I think Ive been pretty clear on why I think an injustice occured here.
-Your congress suggestion was hilarious btw (I assume you were kidding, if you were serious that paragraph is more naive than the one about the infalliable jury)
– “That enough for ya’?”
No! Thats a “probably” and “almost certainly” Definitely not enough to get off scot free fur killing (even accidentally)
-“And I will always support the right to protest”
Again so we agree! as Ive said from my very first post that mentioned you.
-“th officers had no idea he had asthma”
The guy looked like a walking health disaster. YW fan says he wheezed when he taked and couldnt walk a block.
-” But the system then was not the system of today”
Not sure if you are serious. It is exactly the same!
-“that case is evidence of a possible incorrect jury ruling is both conjecture and inaccurate.”
Agreed! it was definitely incorrect jury ruling (Oj later all but confessed). (Though I wonder how you can judge that case if you arent clued in to the events of that trial)