Reply To: No police protection for a week

Home Forums Health & Fitness No police protection for a week Reply To: No police protection for a week

#1051585
ubiquitin
Participant

Health You have still not answered here is my question again:

“”If it tuns out that Officers Ramos and Liu have ever stolen anything in their lives (even a shava perutah or less), ever been mevarech Hashem, gilui Arayos etc, then it is “very good” that they got shot!?”

(this is what you replied: “What religion are you? Why do libs always have to make the good people (cops) bad & the bad people good?” I dont see an answer there, As to your question I am definitely not an adherent of healthism)

DY, I never said they attemped to harm him, and of course he was resisting arrest.

Gamanit

That isnt exactly how grand juries work they can indict any one they want. For them to watch that video and say nobody did naything worthy of goinfg to trial is upseting o me and worthy of protest. This point has gotten lost over the course of this conversation. I’m not sure that the officers should be found guilty, all I’m saying is there should at least be a trial. For a grand jury to watch the video I saw and conclude nothing wrong took place is very disconcerting and worthy of protest. That is all I am saying. (If you read through the entire looooong conversation this is clear, it may not be apparent from one specific comment). To this end Nequetim agrees, protest is acceptable, he also agrees he police were (partly) “culpable” in the death and used “excessive force” our argument now is if the grand jury should automatically be accepted or not.

So really even if THOSE officers were justly not charged, it doesnt really change the overall situation, in whihc an injustice took place and nobody is being called to answer for it

I love wikipedia, but if you read something that sounds strange check the source. If you look at the source where the heart attack is referenced, it is not there