DY: When dealing with something presumably assur, then koach of heter is the bigger chiddush. When dealing with something presumably muttar than the koach of issur is the bigger chiddush.
I suppose my main gripe here, and with many other “rules” of tznius, is who says the presumption is to asser?
If I were to discuss the halachos of standing on my head and Lior were to say that it is equivalent to theft is he saying the lesser chiddush? Erring on the side of caution or ignorance?