You’re grasping at straws. It’s not even remotely a question. If you think (for who knows what reason) that codes appearing in all variations of chaseros and yeseiros in a way which is a mathematical impossibility is meaningless, besides for that being unreasonable, you can still posit that it’s only in this one, which is the one Hashem knew would be here in the computer age.
And again, the proponents I’m referring to deny that the codes work elsewhere, so if some wacko makes up codes that do, who cares? If the codes which Rips and the other people used are mathematically impossible, you’re going to say that’s meaningless?