“Sure, but your position starting off was a technical question of whether one is a apikores for denying that there will be a geulah.
In which I note you’ve argued yourself into circles and quite forgotten what you’re argument is.”
I don’t think my position has changed. I’m still discussing whether denying the geulah makes you an apikores. There was a side point that on a personal level it doesn’t bother me what anyone believes. You then brought in techeiles (presumably it was somewhat in jest and making fun of the fact that I have been talking about techeiles a lot lately). But I don’t see that I changed anything.