SDD: My posts have got progressively longer due to your inane responses. for example, initially I merely stated that PR wise, and therefore security wise, it would be bad for Israel to let them die.
I admit I wasn’t concise, but my central point was obvious. As the question I was answering was not the one yekke2 and yourself were, I provided some context, and a rundown of the issue first. I did ‘show my working’ first, as experience has led me to believe that getting all that out of the way first helps in the CR. But the actual answer was contained in a short, to-the-point paragraph to finish my post. And I signposted it as such.
You then said that doesn’t explain anything. Your own words. So I elaborated further as to why that would be the case, due to the emotional nature. You then said that doesn’t explain it either, citing intelligent people being taken in. So I went into even greater detail about the way this galvanises support.
So all the ‘pretty words’ were in order to answer rather vague, nitpicking questions that were not part of the original query, and from repeatedly requesting further clarity whilst continually failing to actually find fault with my reasoning in any meaningful way. I don’t mean to be harsh, but were this a verbal argument it would basically consist of me saying something and you going ‘Why?’, and then me explaining even deeper and then you going ‘Why?’, untill I finally explain everything, including the unecessary and obvious details, to which you reply, ‘Well, why didn’t you say so in the first place?’. Except I would probably have walked off long before then.