Stam
1. You should, you caim to want to be educated on the subject.
Mumps, Measles, and Rubella Vaccine and the Incidence of Autism Recorded by General Practitioners: A Time Trend Analysis
Kaye JA, et al., British Medical Journal. 2001; 322:460-63
was independently funded by the investigators.
I dont mean publish her anecdotes stan and jan berenstein published a series of books about talking bears. I mean data how many people were involved what treatment did they recieve? How was response measured? By whom? were they blinded? etc
2. NO but you do have to explain why you beleive every silly thing you read. The head of the FDA is Michael R. Taylor. He never worked for big pharm
3.
4. Thanks will bli neder get to it.
5. iyh by you. Fact (even ones you dont like) should trump opinion
6. Tay sachs (or any enzyme defficncy) cant be treated by diet nor can any anatomic abnormality that requires surgery. DO you beleive heart attacks can be treated (not prevented) by diet?
7. Simple question because youve said different things:
Do doctors sometimes reccomend diet as therapy for certain ailments?
8. What? Congressmen have nothing to do with the FDA (or CDC), do you not know about the division of powers the two arent related at all?
“WHAT DON’T YOU UNDERSTAND !!!!!”
I dont understand how a person can have such strong opinions without knowing anything about the subject at hand. You dont know how studies are done, you didnt know studies existed, you dont trust a governement that you have no clue how it functions and you believe all sorts of junk you read online.
“I believe the rest of your comments were discussed above or my answer to Syag.”
I cant find where.
But maybe you can clarify:
Would you change your mind if faced with evidence that opposed your belief?
And your Friend Gerson, and Whal, mercola etc…
They arent making money of their quackery?