Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › changing neighborhoods and anti-semitism › Reply To: changing neighborhoods and anti-semitism
Joseph
Since you are so instent I’ll pateintly break apart each line of your wrong post. Since I’m such a nice guy.
“For the umpteenth time, your hypothetical question was about an ordinance for the (to directly quote you) “obvious goal of preventing Goyim from moving in”.”
Correct! That is my question
” I told you such an ordinance is unconstitutional on the face of it.”
You did say this, but are wrong.
” Tenafly proves my point.”
No it proves mine.
” If the intention of the municipality (as in your hypothetical) was to specifically and directly and singularly target a specific religion, it is unconstitutional.”
Read Tenafly it was NOT regarding the intention of the ordinance.
“That’s what your question pertained to and was.”
Yes
” Tenafly did target a specific religion and thus it was unconstitutional.”
The ordinace didnt target a religion, rather the ENFORCEMNT did.
” It doesn’t matter that the ordinance was broader”
It does! the ordienace in of itself. IF evenly enforced is constitutional even if it prevenbts the eruv!!!
“since what mattered was how they selectively enforced it.”
This part is right! Im not sure how you got so muddled regarding the rest!!!
AGAIN, just so we are crystal clear the violation accoring to the Tenafly appeals court was the selective enforcment! not the ordinance nor its intent.
Which of course brings back my question…..