Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Soldier who killed the "neutralized" terrorist › Reply To: Soldier who killed the "neutralized" terrorist
March 30, 2016 7:19 pm at 7:19 pm
#1144463
☕ DaasYochid ☕
Participant
Simcha613
1) Why should we assume that will change?
2) I’m not assuming that he definitely will, but it has happened, so why should I assume he won’t? You definitely can’t call him “neutralized”, although (assuming currently unarmed) he should be, if not for prisoner exchanges.