TMB-
That argument presented there is fallacious because the same way the gemara (and SA and Rambam) says there are things a woman is obligated to do for her husband, it also says a man has things he is obligated to do for his wife. Moreover, the obligations of a man to his wife are explicit in the Torah (???? ????? ?????? ?? ???? in mishpatim) while the obligations of a woman to her husband are not – other than the fact that she must be faithful to him. These halachos do not in any way imply that the wife is owned by her husband or has less of a say than he does.