See my earlier comment about metzius.
Please explain it to me then. I do not understand how you can explain that Bais Din executed a physical BSUM and didn’t execute a metaphysical one (or vice versa).
Please explain to me how it’s possible to reconcile that Iyov both existed and did not exist by saying it’s physical and metaphysical.
The Tanaiim in Sanhedrin argue about whether the Torah was given in our present Hebrew script or the old Ivri script. The Torah was only given in one script — no opinion in the Gemara says it was given at Sinai in both. Please explain how this is not an argument in metzius.
Also in Sanhedrin (25a) there are two opinions about a Shor HaBor. One says that it is a chayah, one says it is a behaimah. Please explain to me how this is not an argument about metzius.
In Rosh Hashanna there is a dispute about whether the flood began in Cheshvan or Iyar. Please explain to me how this can be explained as a physical/metaphysical manner.
In short, I’ve brought you several examples of cases where Chazal argue about metzius. Your have, to date, failed to explain how these disputes square with your statement (your example of being physical/metaphysical clearly cannot account for these disputes).
The Wolf