I think it is important to understand that Feminism is an actual sociological term with a set definition. Not all feminist are men-haters. Some are and they are called radical feminists. These are the women whose agenda is to break down the family institution because they believe it is a system of oppression. It are the radical feminists who are truly a threat to the family as we know it. That said, just like any radical group they tend to be fewer in number but have a greater presence in the mainstream media.
There are also liberal feminists whose main agenda is equal opportunities, similar to the efforts of African Americans during the civil rights movement of the 1950s. They are people promoting “equal pay for equal work.
Hereorthere, I am not sure I understand your logic in the following passage:
“Those trying to claim; There supposedly, is no feminist agenda being pushed in these cases, are proving there is. Because they automatically reject ANYTHING that does not automatically and always blame the man, in each and every case.”
The denial of something does not automatically support or prove the opposite of that. Denying the corruption of the courts does not necessarily mean an individual supports ignoring any evidence that does not support the woman’s case. The logic simply does not follow.