Reply To: Feminism

SJSinNYC; Even arosem agreed that such feminists exist, ask ‘him/her’ to ‘cite’.

arosem the liberal feminists ARE the radicals.

This is like the antisemites (who the liberal feminists support) who claim they do not hate Jews just “Zionists”.

If all they wanted was equality they would oppose special treatment for women but they do not.

Not one feminist group has EVER opposed companies that hire women who are less qualified then men competing for a job, because the company is afraid of discrimination lawsuits (or any other reason for that matter).

Not one feminist group has ever opposed the imbalance of so many more women these days entering college then men despite the fact that they ALL screamed long and loud when in the past, it was men who were entering college at greater rates then women.

Not one feminist group, ever opposed tiny undersized police women who can’t handle the more physical aspects of policing like making a raid on a violent motorcycle gang.

If they truly cared about EQUALITY, they would oppose these things and they never do.

arosem; The claims in your last paragraph are full of holes and totaly illogical.

Your argument is tantamount to claiming that Stalinists as part of their agenda as a group, couldn’t hate Jews because they had no written down ‘Manifesto’ that ‘specified’ hating Jews, yet Jews who lived under that system, can tell you all about Stalins systematic persecution of Jews.

Your other argument is like claiming the Stalinists cannot hate Jews, because others (like Nazis) also hate Jews.

Both of those arguments are utter nonsense.

Since you admit there are radical feminists how can you then claim that none of them ever became lawyers and judges and as such, never allowed their feminist agenda, to influence their practice, (or rulings for feminist judges)?

Why indeed, does Torah not allow women judges in the first place (and Devorah was a singular exception, NOT the general halacha)?