Reply To: Feminism

Home Forums Controversial Topics Feminism Reply To: Feminism

#1162711
hereorthere
Member

SJSinNYC

Member

Hereorthere, the reason you are frustrating to talk to is that you add your commentary to anything someone says and attribute it back to them.”

That is your claim but you cannot prove it in not in fact the other way around.

SJSinNYC ” I never said abuse was rampant. I said no one should tolerate an abusive relationship. There is a major difference. Please learn to read what I write, not what you percieve. “

I never said it was non existent but I was ACCUSED of saying that.

If others can put words into my mouth, then I have just as much right to do it to them.

And this is not a case of “getting someone back” it is a case of exposing liberal tactics of how they hold everyone else to an impossibly high standard (like with Israel) while holding

themselves to far more lenient ones, and I am exposing the liberal hypocrisy.

“SJSinNYC “Also, when you make a claim about websites and are asked to cite, you should.”

What websites are you talking about?

SJSinNYC”Arose didn’t mention the websites – you did. I know radical feminist exist, no one denies that. I also know not to judge a movement by its radicals only.”

Anyone who wants TRUE equal treatment is simply someone who wants that.

Someone who becomes a specific type of “advocate” like a feminist has a certain agenda.

I have personal bad experiences with some who have been strong supporters of extreme radical feminism and yet they never used any words like “women lib” or Feminists” or anything like that.

But they CLEARLY supported the most radical extreme feminist agenda and no one around them ever suspected such a thing because they were very careful to push for their agenda in subtle ways in public and get far more forceful in personal situations that would be chalked up to “that was their reaction in that siatuation and they had a point” (No they did not have a legitimate point, anymore then a holocaust denier, has a point when he mentions Bernie Madhoff and talks about

“How corrupt the Jews are”.

SJSinNYC “You also never responded as to which of those five situations I posted someone should stay in marriage. Please respond. “

Yes I did respond a second time, after it was deleted the first time.

I said that the issue is not what sitiutions would mean there ashould be adivorce but HOW OFTEN those truly horrible situations actually come up in a way they can be proven to be true, and not just someone lying that the husband supposedly did something,

he never actually did, just son those telling such lies can promote some ulterior motive.

SJSinNYC “Why are poor men not allowed to be judges? There was an exception made for a woman, was there an exception ever made for a poor man? “

No one by defnition, can be immune to bribes if they are poor.

It does not prove that a poor man never had the capabilities to understand and give proper halachic unemotional responses to the cases involved.

Find a Gadol who will pasken that women can be judges, then.

Why won’t anyone be able to find one?

SJSinNYC”I’m not sure if you realize this, but all forms of discrimination are still rampant. There was a study done recently where they put qualified black men and white men with prior jail sentences (fabricated on their resume for the study). In most cases, the white man with the jail sentence was picked over the qualified black man with no jail sentence. It was a fairly small study so it doesn’t “prove” anything, other than some discrimination still exists.”

Discrimination exists but that is not the same as severe divorce causing abuse in the heimish community.

And there is plenty of discrimination against White males as well.

At one point I was considering trying to get a job as a NYC transit authority track worker, and it was suggested to me that as a Jew among all non Jews, it would not take much for there to be an ‘accident’ where I had’fallen’ against the third rail.

SJSinNYC”If feminists had their way there would be gender segregation because studies have shown that girls do better in single gender classrooms and boys do better in coed classrooms.”

Wrong, in a New York coed class it showed that BOTH genders did better in gender segragated classes.

I heard this on on of the radio shows, (Hannity or Rush most likely), a few years ago.

And for someone always saying I should ‘cite’ sources I notice you did not do the same.

SJSinNYC “I’m also not sure what the point of the bleacher story was. Did you ask the father to keep his son from kicking? I would have been really upset with you for yelling at my son like that.”

I was already upset that this father had raised such a monster of a son who could even THINK of doing anything like that.

I have had plenty of experience with such types and they just make excuses for it and blame the victim.

SJSinNYC “I’m not sure what your issue with feminism trying to tackle women’s issues and not bullying of kids. Their primary purpose is to protect women. We have organizations whos primary function it is to protect Jews. There are all sorts of organizations that focus on some subset of the population. No one can fight every battle.”

All these liberal organizations get together to support their mutual causes.

Feminists also march with gay activists and with PLO supporters and with animal rights wackos.

But NOT ONCE have they EVER marched to stop school bullying.

They actively go out to prosecute fathers accused of spanking their boys claiming it is ‘abuse’ and further claiming such abuse cause more abuse to their own wives and children.

If so then then being bullied in school will ALSO cause such abuse down the line, and yet the feminists have nothing to say about it.

Pure liberal hypocrisy.

SJSinNYC “While I am a fan of Hannity, I realize he too has bias. You can’t trust any news source 100%. “

I don’t; I know Hannity is still a liberal after all.

SJSinNYC “I’m going to research the girls vs boys entering college thing. I don’t know enough about it. “

As Haannity says, please give me full report 🙂

1