Apologies about the comment on the Utah case. I see a few months ago the appeals court went back on the three year old district court decision and rendered it moot because Utah stated they have no intentions of enforcing the unconstitutional law anyways, and that it was irrelevant in the original case since they never prosecuted the guy who challenged it with violating that law. So the court said there was no case for a decision to be rendered on.
Nevertheless, the SCOTUS’ toeiva marriage decision was even stronger in making it impossible for states to regulate religious-only marriages, something that couldn’t have been enforced even before that decision.