FuturePOTUS,
I’ll mention a few more things about this though. He did see the original post, and read through many of the responses.
Thank you for the clarification of this at least.
[He] gave a full logical reason as to why the post did not constitute an issur l’halacha. What he said fully answers the questions and difficulties you had with the psak. I didn’t post the details online, because as I said on the original thread, it’s not for those who don’t have smicha to debate the psak from someone who does
I, for one, don’t want to debate a psak you received, but to understand the reasoning. Unlike many Internet denizens, I can be convinced. 🙂 I understand why you wouldn’t post your rav’s name; I’d personally be upset on his behalf if you did, but I do not understand why you refuse to post the reasoning.
and as we can all see, even though I left out the details, it still became a massive discussion.
I think it became a “massive” (27 posts is massive?) discussion largely because you left out the details.