Metch1
“but for the purpose of keeping government in check.”
that isnt the way it was understood for the first 2 centuries of its existence.
“mandated militia/gun ownership ”
which is it?
“For a conversation to have a validity there needs to be an acknowledgement to both sides having a point”
I agree both sides have a point. I think guns are awesome. But Im willing to give it up if it will help society.
“Ubiq wants to compare slavery (an obviously immoral law) to gun ownership”
Thats not what Isaid, I pointed out just because it is in the constitution odesnt give it moral validity
“on a philosophical level, Ani Mamin bemuna shelema in the hashgocho of a RBSO”
So give up your guns and you will be just as protected without them.