Takes2ttango
Im sorry Im not sure if our comment is addressed to me. I dont understand it or its relevance.
Gingerkale
“or will that change with the coming of Mashiach? and if that latter, please explain how.”
I dont know. Im excited to find out though.
“we have a Torah, and that DOES include Techeiles.”
As mentioned it also includes Yibum. Last time you had a spot that you didint know what it was, did you go to a kohein (Mitzvah 169 in chinuch)? We dont practice wah tthe Torah says that was the Tzedoki approach. We practice the Torah as interpreted by torah shebal peh and as handed down ish mipi rabbo, and as codified by Rishonim/acronim
The fake maven
You are contradicting yourself You disagree with my rewording of your faulty premise “all Jews must do all mitzvohs” Yet concede “… only if a divorce is needed. …Every circumstantial mitzvah is a mitzvah if and only if the circumstances call for it.”
which is almost verbatim my rewording “all Jews must do every mitzvah possible if circumstances call for it”
So Im not sure what your disagreement is there.
You then go on “Premise A in regards to Gitten …”
But my example was yibum
“As to archaeology…”
I was using that as a generalization meaning modern research. and lol at “testimony of the gentiles”
Of course I may be wrong. Though I am not alone, my rebeim felt that way. Rav Elyashiv felt that way. The Chazon ish was opposed to paskening based on manuscripts. R’ Yoshe Ber said we dont pasken from Genizahs (what he called the garbage can). while Admitedly the evidence for the murex is stronger than the cases made based on manuscrits and it isnt exactly the same. The principle holds