ubiquitin
“I am always eager to hear more. IF you dont want to help me find it . no problem there is always google. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction.”
If you really are interested I already told you were to look. My point is if your lazy to go thru the topic, I’m not going to help you.
“Cmon that is the weakest excuse. You cant possibly believe that.”
You have another explanation? It’s a fact the bigger the gadol the less time he has. And because almost all people when they hear about it, they don’t believe it, [until they research it themselves], the same with rav chaim he is not going to spend his time on it.
“We may be going in circles. But over a thousand years of mesora says so.”
Huh??!! Your not going to find someone who disagrees with you. But what does that have to do with it, its very possible that now we found it. [as the maharil says that its possible].
“and the again of course there is the inconvenient fact that most Gedolim today do not wear it.“
And again you keep on leaving out the inconvenient fact that most of the gedolim were not mevarer. And from those that were, most came to the same conclusion: techeiles is back!!
Regarding Rabbi Resiman. Just look on the mentioned website.
“you quoted the Beis halevei earlier. I found the source I was looking for
R’ yoshe Ber quotes from his Grandfather (The beis Halevi) in Shiurim Lezeicher Aba Mari, chelek 1 page 228 that we dont prove based on research, when a specific item is required for a Mitzvah. This is why the Beis Halevi rejected the Radziner’s techeiles and the principle holds true with the murex as well.
Dont feel bad if you havent come across this in your research, it in no way proves you never went thru the topic at all. It is a vast topic. With many dimensions. there is always more to share. and now you know.”
The בית הלוי I quoted is in the teshuvas. Regarding what you are quoting, [realy sorry but a know it already]. I usually try not to waste time on all the brisker bubeh maises, especially when thy are not compatible with the letter the בית הלוי sent the radziner rebbe, what is printed his the sefer. There he says a slightly different reason from what is said in his name בבית בריסק, and changes the whole perspective, and would not apply regarding the murex. So no, if have to pick between what the בית הלוי said to what is said in his name, its obvious the latter is out the window. [as would every sane person].
By the way, I don’t know if I’ll be wasting more of my time debating someone who never went thru the topic.