Tom
“you have not, as is apparent from the constant inaccuracies in your statements. ”
Its clear from my say so. I am not pretending to have done thorough research let alone “very thorough ”
Although I would question how good your research has been given that you are having trouble with a simple halacha
A few posters here have said that not wearing techeiles is being mevate lthe mitzva of tzitizis.
This is incorrect. If you were to say that not wearing shel rosh means you werent yotzeh tefilin you would likewise be incorrect.
“and the same is true for techailes.”
Arguably. What isnt arguable though is that it is circular reasoning to say “there is a chiyuv to wear this debated techelies and otherwise yo uarent yotzeh tzitzis sincedebated techeiles is available, and therefore there is nothing further to debate” (this isnt an actual quote from anybosdy here but it is a summary of the argument using the fact that we are being mevatel a mizvah.
Put another way, the only way you can possibly say it is being mevatel a mitzvah is if we are sure it is techeiles. And one of the arguments being made to accept it is that not doing so would be mevatel a mitzvah.
Ditto for my argument based on mesora. If it requires a mesora (and I grant not all agree) then not wearing it because there is no mesora is not being mevatel a mitzvah.
“Had you attended the asifa, you would have heard this being explained clearly and thoroughly. ”
do you believe 100% of the audience will now wear techeiles?