youdint say
“Who was speaking to you? ”
whoever cares to read. and to flush out my own ideas. As mentioned I learnt a lot from this thread.
“Most of what I wrote was not addressed to you.”
It is still wrong. and wrong comments are worthy of response
“More likely you are an obstinate person.”
could be. But what is motivating you?
“No, Rabbi Kaganhoff is entitled to his opinion. However, I am entitled to call him out when he errs.”
Beseder. So it is a machlokes (and he isnt the only one who disagrees as you correctly point out “In any case, most of his arguments are not new” Though I’m not sure why that would make them wrong.).
“You simply miss my point regarding Teshuvos V’Hanhagos. You don’t get the politics surrounding it. I stand by my argument, ”
I didn’t miss it. I understood that you were being dismissive of R’ Moshe Shternbuch’s ability/right to pasken .
“it is a krankeit to cite Brisker Torah l’halacha.”
See I was right. You are arguing that R’ Moshe Shternbuch suffers from a krankeit and cant be cited as a halachic source.
“You don’t understand mesorah, and halacha psuka. Its not your fault, its a Brisker thing.”
I am not a brisker. and So now Brisker’s dont understnad halacha? Seriously do you beleive these kind of arguments are motivated by the Yetzer Tov?
BTW another excelent example occured to me When Dr. Yehuda Felix brougt proof that sheboles shula isnt Oats. R’ Moshe replied that even with another thousand proofs we wont change a tradition in klal yisreol (yep not exactly analagous, but the point is there)
” There is no chance that you are not yotze.”
Agreed completely. was this a typo?