Mentch1
“I fail to see how limiting guns would help anything, after all, it just takes one”
Then you arent looking honestly. More gun ownership = more homicide this is obvious and conclusively proven on the state level and national level.
Now you can argue that they are relatively few, and that you need guns in case the government becomes tyrannical or something and therefore it is a small price to pay. in short the benefits outweigh the risks.
Obviously more car ownership = more vehicular death. Though in that case we all agree the benefits outweigh the risk. But To argue that “limiting gun ownership” “wouldn’t help anything” is absurd