doomsday: 0.25 per 1,000 died of Pediarix ALONE. But US Babies get MULTIPLE vaccines at 2 months, 4 months,
and 6 months so their SIDS rate was even higher then babies who only got Pediarix in the vaccine trials.
No. 0 out of 1,000 died of Pediarix. 0.25 out of 1,000 died after receiving Pediarix, which is about how many you would expect to die in that period no matter what.
And of course those babies did not get only Pediarix. They got all the normal vaccines as well, except the ones that Pediarix was designed to replace. The whole point of the trial was to see whether Pediarix did better than those other vaccines. They still needed to be protected from those diseases Pediarix doesn’t deal with, so they got everything else. And only 0.25 out of 1,000 died, which means Pediarix didn’t kill any of them.
And 90% of SIDS death “just happen” to occur during the 6 months when newborn babies are given multiple vaccines three times. What a Coincidence
Yes, it is a coincidence. Those are the same months that babies were dying for millennia before there were any vaccines.
Just like it is a “Coincidence” that Children get Autism right after their vaccinations
Again, that is when autistic children have always started showing symptoms, ever since the creation of the world, so yes, it is a coincidence.
ProVaxxers claim that vaccines only cause 1 in a Million deaths. But the vaccine trials of ONE vaccine showed a death rate 1:4,000. Which is the normal rate of crib death, with or without vaccines. The vaccines did not add anything to the expected number.
And Babies don’t get one vaccine at a time but 7-8 vaccines at a time so the death rate from vaccine is even higher then 1:4,000!
Again, no. The background crib death rate remains the same no matter how many vaccines are added, because vaccines do not kill babies (at least not in numbers measurable in a normal-scaled trial).
Prior to 1960s when Infant Vaccines became widespread, “crib death” as it was known was so RARE that it wasn’t even listed in infant mortality statistics!
More lies. Before the ’60s it was much more common for children to die for no known reason than it is now. It was just accepted that babies die. And that’s all crib death or SIDS is.
Folks, the ProVaxxers can’t dispute the PROOF that Dr. Scheibner produced:
Sure we can. I dispute it.
The ProVaxxers can’t dispute that studies published in the Most Prestigious Medical Journals all support Dr. Scheibner’s findings.
Yes, we can. If these studies existed that found the same things you say she did, you wouldn’t even need to mention her. You’d just cite them directly.
How can a Judge say the Parents brought sufficient proof that it is most likely their babies SIDS were caused by vaccines and in the same breath deny that vaccines present a substantial risk of SIDS???
He didn’t say that at all. On the contrary, he said the parents presented sufficient evidence and testimony to entitle them to compensation. That is all. They’re entitled to the money they applied for. They did not present evidence that vaccines present a substantial risk of SIDS.
You just answered your own question on what caused the number of SIDS to drop – they started attributing Babies dying in their sleep to OTHER causes such as “UNKNOWN Cause”
That is SIDS. There are not two categories.
the Number of Babies Dying in their Sleep was basically the Same – even after the “Back to Sleep” Campaign!
More lies. The number went down dramatically. The biggest proof that the drop is directly attributable to this message is that Australians got it a decade earlier and experienced a dramatic drop. For some reason it took ten years for American parents to get the same message, but lo and behold, as soon as they got it the same drop happened. In total deaths, not deaths written off as unexplained, which is what SIDS means. Any chart you’ve seen that says otherwise is fraudulent.
LA Mom posted that two of her friends children fell into a vegetative state after vaccination.
I Did Not Interchange Autism and Vegetative State as you Lie!
Um, yes, you did. In reply #1638039 you did exactly that. You wrote that LA Mother’s fantastic story made sense because autism runs in families.