Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Studies on vaccines you might have missed.👨🔬💉🚫 › Reply To: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.👨🔬💉🚫
Dooms.
Your making it very easy, you are just going in circles this has been discussed earlier in this very thread, yet you seem to not get it.
“Because FAKE STUDIES are designed to prove whatever the Corporation/CDC PAYING for the study wants!
This is what the Editors of the Most PRESTIGIOUS MEDICAL JOURNALS say! See below:
Editor of The New England Journal of Medicine “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine”
Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, wrote that “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness”
Actually, if you read the article, R. Horton actually writes that the science has greatly improved we now need to implement the updated and clean up old practices.
The first paragraph (you do not even attribute it to the writer, seems like you didnt fully select all when you copy/pasted).
Below is what has been written about this earlier.
“a. Dr. Marcia Angell, to use this as an argument against vaccines is silly, she is a big believer in science, in the very same claim against published data she also makes the claim that alternative medicine has gained popularity yet, in reality, we should not acknowledge them, as only pure science should play a role, her concern was that we no longer use pure science in medicine to the extent that we should use.”
In the future, it would be appreciated if you actually read the articles in its entirety rather than just posting snippets that seem to further your agenda.
These people were all for science, they would discard anectodal stories in a heartbeat, they just wanted science to be even better.